Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Yosemite Sunrise

  1. #1
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    82
    Threads
    30
    Thank You Posts

    Default Yosemite Sunrise

    From my last week's trip to Yosemite NP. I had just one morning with some clouds and used that for Glacier Point at sunrise.



    Canon EOS 5D, 4.0/70-200L IS at 70mm, ISO100, f10, 1/6sec

    All comments are welcome

    Bernd

  2. #2
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    3,596
    Threads
    260
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Lovely sky, really beautiful texture, colour and detail. Not sure how I feel about the great big rock in the middle of the image, on my monitor it just looks like a dark lump. I'm not a great lover of boulders and rocks right in the foreground so I might be the only one who is not so keen on it. :confused:

  3. #3
    Roman Kurywczak
    Guest

    Default

    Hi Bernd,
    This is a classic example of the choice we have to make on whether to use or not use the split ND. If you used a couple of split ND's.......you would have brought out more detail in the FG of Half dome and the distant mountains and given even more color to the sky.
    If you wanted this as a silhouette....you wouldn't use the split ND's and move the histogram to the left/blacks possibly even clipping it some on that side......this makes stronger blacks and gives the sky colors even more pop. You may be able to add blacks in selective color to both the neutrals and blacks......giving you the same result and if that is the direction you were going......worth exploring. Not sure if you are into it but you can also process this image twice.....once for the sky and once for the mountain details......and combine the 2......may also give you the same result but does require a bit of computer work. That is why I always choose the filters.....quicker and easier!
    I do feel you have enough there in the image to bring it up a notch with just a few PP'ing tweaks.

  4. #4
    Robert Amoruso
    Guest

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Bernd,

    This is what Roman has in mind I'm guessing with regards to the ND filters.

    Did this in PS using Shadows/Highlights opening up both Shadows and Highlights. The problem with this method is noise in the FG. HDR or two exposures, one for FG and one for sky combined using layers in PS would have been another approach. Note that FG lacks contrast due to the S/H adjustment - typical problem requiring further curves adjustment in the FG.

  5. #5
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    82
    Threads
    30
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Roman and Robert,

    my purpose was to hold Half Dome in the shadow (I had NDs in my bag, but decided against them). On the other side, I see in Roberts alteration that I was to careful in enhancing the reds.

    Below is my new version.



    Regards

    Bernd

  6. #6
    Roman Kurywczak
    Guest

    Default

    Re-post looks good Bern with the color boost. I'm OK with the details in the shadows as presented.....just offered other options.

  7. #7
    Robert Amoruso
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by beykirch View Post
    Hi Roman and Robert,

    my purpose was to hold Half Dome in the shadow (I had NDs in my bag, but decided against them). On the other side, I see in Roberts alteration that I was to careful in enhancing the reds. Regards

    Bernd
    Bernd, I figured your purpose was the silhouette of half-dome. :) I like the repost and enhanced look to the sky.

  8. #8
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Boynton Beach, Florida
    Posts
    7,726
    Threads
    640
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    repost looks smoking!! congrats on getting that nice sky.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics