Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Wimberley Sidekick vs. Mongoose M-3.5 Action Hea

  1. #1
    Nathan Lovas
    Guest

    Default Wimberley Sidekick vs. Mongoose M-3.5 Action Hea

    I was ready to purchase a Wimberley Sidekick for my 200-400 VR, but yesterday heard about the Mongoose M-3.5 Action Head. Does anyone have any experience with them? I know there were some previous posts here, but thought I would see exactly what people think the better option is and why...thanks....Nate.

  2. #2
    Rod Wiley
    Guest

    Default

    Nate I have the side kick and use it with a Kirk BH-1 ball head. For the 200-400 it's perfect. My main reason for it is that I can take it off and use the ball head anytime I want for landscapes. Rod

  3. #3
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    3,911
    Threads
    459
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Nate,

    Both costs you probably the same amount of money.

    Like Rod explained with Sidekick and ball head you can cover landscapes too.

    If you are in weight considerations, Mongoose is the solution.
    Also, quick release to take the lens for flight shots is some thing really useful. Coming to panning capabilities I have never seen anything better than mongoose.

    Here is a short review of gimbal heads I did few months back.

    http://luminepixels.wordpress.com/20...-the-solution/

  4. #4
    Rene A
    Guest

    Default

    Hi Nate,

    Your post was what I was looking for
    because I ordered Mongose 2.3 for my setup with a Gitzo 3530.

    Thanks

  5. #5
    Robert O'Toole
    Guest

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Hi Nathan,

    As a former sidekick owner and current 200-400 + M3.5 owner go for the mongoose 100%!!! The combo is perfect and works like a dream.

    FYI, you can easily use the mongoose for landscapes with the C-90 bracket, which I own also. Here is a pic and link.

    C-90 link

    You can buy the head and c-90 from Birds as art

    Robert

    Note: you would also need a unidirectional QR body plate if you plan to do wide angle landscape work.

  6. #6
    Alfred Forns
    Guest

    Default

    Another vote for the Mongoose

    If you go the ballhead sidekick rout The weight difference is substantial plus it has more moving parts btw Robert uses the 3.5 with his 600 !!!!

  7. #7
    Robert Amoruso
    Guest

    Default

    Same here, I use the 3.5 with my 600mm but if weight is not a concern I prefer the Wimberly over the Mongoose.

  8. #8
    BPN Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Brussels, Belgium
    Posts
    1,115
    Threads
    118
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Guys,
    Thanks. The information posted is really useful and helping me to make my buying choices.
    Am I right in understanding that for anything but a collared lens I will need to have a camera plate (CB-73 Bi-Directional Body Plate $52) and a C-90 (Quick 90 degree bracket $220) for horizontals?
    I didn't see either of these plates on the BAA site and I noticed on the 4th Gen site that the c-90 was out of stock.

    Gerald

  9. #9
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Wapakoneta, OH
    Posts
    34
    Threads
    19
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Nathan, Artie has a very nice article addressing this issue in his BIRDS AS ART BULLETIN # 254. I highly recommend reading it - it is a very informative article.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics