Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: White Faced Heron

  1. #1
    Christopher C.M. Cooke
    Guest

    Default White Faced Heron

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Captured with Canon 30D with 300mm F4 IS + 1.4X Con (420mm), 1/500 sec, f/9, ISO-200, Pattern Metering, Shutter priority.

    http://birdphotographers.net/forums/...1&d=1202634777

  2. #2
    Forum Participant John Cooper's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Australia - New South Wales
    Posts
    2,065
    Threads
    241
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi chris. You managed to get a good angle and pose of this wind-swept Heron! I find the cropping a bit tight though and the focus is a little soft - another round of sharpening would help. White face around the eye is looking hot, were there any pixels here before you started processing?

  3. #3
    Gautam Biswas
    Guest

    Default

    I echo John's comments above. There is some loss of detail in the white portion around the eye as well as the shadow inthe belly.

  4. #4
    Christopher C.M. Cooke
    Guest

    Default

    Thanks folks,but you are dealing with a rank amateur here and your advice is rather cryptic to me?

    Any chance of " PS for bloody fools" here.?

  5. #5
    Richard Kowalski
    Guest

    Default

    Hey Chris,

    There isn't much room around the bird, so the image is too crowded, or as John said, the cropping is too tight.

    The whites look over exposed, or "hot". This may mean the pixels were saturated by overexposure when you made the image or it is possible that you over processed the image later on.

    All digital image usually require some degree of sharpening. Just the nature of the beast. Since the bird looks a little soft, some sharpening is in order.

    May I suggest you look at posting in "Eager to Learn"? That might be a better place to get a handle on proper exposures, cropping, processing, etc.

  6. #6
    Axel Hildebrandt
    Guest

    Default

    Nice find and pose. Richard summed it well up what could be improved. You should leave more room for the 'virtual' legs, in other words the parts of the legs that are submerged should be treated as if they were visible. It is very difficult to expose a bird like this properly since there are only few bright areas in the plumage. I would try a bit negative exposure compensation and try to balance shadows and highlights in your RAW converter.

  7. #7
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Victoria, BC
    Posts
    1,662
    Threads
    441
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Some good points already mentioned. Can I ask if you were using a tripod? Or is this a large crop?

    If you are not using a tripod I would highly recommend it as it will give you that extra stability and also often makes you take that extra second to think about composition.

  8. #8
    Christopher C.M. Cooke
    Guest

    Default

    Thanks folks, that is easier to understand.

    No no tripod and the image is captured from a viewing platform at a wetland and is quite heavily cropped to remove weed and scum on the water surface, I will revisit the original and see what improvements I can make.

    Thanks again for your invaluable advice.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics