Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: D300s Near UniWB File

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Haverhill, Massachusetts
    Posts
    1,647
    Threads
    313
    Thank You Posts

    Default D300s Near UniWB File

    With some help from Gollywop in the form of a written tutorial, I spent some time last evening and created a D300s NUWB file (that's my new abbreviation :)

    I've sent it to Iliah for him to check it out...once blessed, it is available.

    Coefficients after taking 27 images and tweaking the heck out of it are:

    0.99609375, 1.00390625, 1, 1

  2. #2
    BPN Viewer Charles Glatzer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    1,690
    Threads
    363
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Jim,

    I shot side by side with one of the guys who came up with the UNIWB in YNP last year. We both derived similar exposures, except I did not have to correct every image in PS to negate the green cast. In my opinion it is an unnecessary step.

    Best,

    Chas

  3. #3
    Co-Founder James Shadle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Valrico, Fl
    Posts
    5,108
    Threads
    1,419
    Thank You Posts
    Blog Entries
    11

    Default

    Jim,
    I look forward to hearing about your experences using your NUWB file.
    James

  4. #4
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Haverhill, Massachusetts
    Posts
    1,647
    Threads
    313
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Chas....

    My simple comment would that you haven't used it enough to see the difference...or the 1/3 to 2/3rds stop gain in DR in certain situations. Not only do I get better shadow area exposure, but noise is lessened as well due to the optimized exposure.

    I don't quite understand how having a very close to real RAW histogram from which to expose by, wouldn't be a good thing as it is dramatically different than what the camera presents you with without using this. All of the cameras internal image optimizations / tweaks are applied to the jpeg derived histogram.

    I don't use PS to convert my RAW images as I find that NX, while a PITB gives me better results. The conversion there is quite simple and since I use this for everything shot outdoors, I don't consider it an extra step.

    Perhaps you don't use the in camera meter as I do?

  5. #5
    BPN Viewer Charles Glatzer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    1,690
    Threads
    363
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Jim,

    I have my in-camera settings tweaked via lower contrast and RGB settings to better reflect what the camera is capable of recording when using the histogram as a reference for exposure. If we both end up shooting at the same exposure how is one method preferential over another. As mentioned we consistently came up with similar exposures....with me using my spot meter and he UNIWB. I think it is more prudent that the user knows how their camera captures light with regard to the meter pattern in use, and how the post-production software of choice renders the captured info. For example LR2 opens the images at a gamma different than captured, making most images appear lighter.

    Regardless...what matters most is the end result...use whatever method(s) you find best!

    Best,

    Chas

  6. #6
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Haverhill, Massachusetts
    Posts
    1,647
    Threads
    313
    Thank You Posts

    Default Charles

    I do believe we in overall agreement :)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics