Results 1 to 29 of 29

Thread: Ready to land

  1. #1
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Córdoba, Spain
    Posts
    3,099
    Threads
    211
    Thank You Posts

    Default Ready to land

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    A flamingo maneuvering for landing facing the wing. Flaps on, undercarriage ready and asking for landing permission :)

    C&C are always appreciated

    Nikon D300 AFS Nikkor 500VR+1,4XTC, handolded, ISO800 f8 1/2000, manual exposure

  2. #2
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Merida, Yucatan,Mexico
    Posts
    2,809
    Threads
    453
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hola Juan,

    Very nice pose, perfect exposure and very "frozen" position with great detail in the plumage. Colors are beautiful too. Pity for the bands. Congratulation for this great capture.

  3. #3
    Brian Barcelos
    Guest

    Default

    Juan, The colors here are wonderful and I love the trailing legs. Exposure is great and lots of detail. I feel the head could use a little more sharpening. Congrats amigo.

    Brian

  4. #4
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    East Sussex
    Posts
    1,889
    Threads
    17
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Clean and crisp Juan. Most unusual pose and must thank you for sharing that. (almost comical). Tack sharp and shows what the D300 in good light with good hands can do. (Oft shots at 800-1000 in poor light looking very disappointing and I have to remember it is the light quality, not the representation of the camera). VWD!

  5. #5
    Forum Participant Joe Senzatimore's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    new york
    Posts
    3,509
    Threads
    524
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Outstanding quality in this image. Color,pose and detail all work together.

  6. #6
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Ahmedabad, Gujarat, INDIA
    Posts
    2,059
    Threads
    319
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    mind blowing quality you have got here... what are those tags on the legs btw ?

  7. #7
    Tell Dickinson
    Guest

    Default

    Hi Juan, very nice shot with good exposure control, I would personally like a bit more canvas on the right to take the bird out of the middle.

    Tell

  8. #8
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    San Francisco Bay Area, CA
    Posts
    5,376
    Threads
    531
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Excellent Image, Juan. Love the pose, colors and the details on the feather.

  9. #9
    Forum Participant Michael Zajac's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    816
    Threads
    93
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Juan, Beautiful flight pose and wing details. Nice composition.

  10. #10
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    23,119
    Threads
    1,523
    Thank You Posts
    Blog Entries
    55

    Default

    Juan, Beautiful details and nice capture. I like the way the neck is bent, it adds interest to the image.Well done.

  11. #11
    Forum Participant Manos Papadomanolakis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Crete Greece
    Posts
    3,408
    Threads
    179
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    What a great flight shot,beautiful pose,light,head angle!!!

  12. #12
    Roman Kurywczak
    Guest

    Default

    Hi Juan,
    You know I don't mind the comp tight......for me the neck position along with the rest.....including the split legs.......very nicely done!

  13. #13
    Publisher Arthur Morris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Indian Lake Estates, FL
    Posts
    32,506
    Threads
    1,433
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Amazing SH and pose. With a perfect EXP. It would be a bit tricky to lose the bands--esp. the one on the far leg--but with your PS expertise it should not be too much of a problem if you choose to lose. I'd love to see this 1/2 again as wide as a pano. It needs more room in front--the bird is virtually centered from side to side--so you might as well go for the whole nine yards. If the framing is good for Mr. Curry-chek, you know that it is too tight for me
    BIRDS AS ART Blog: great info and lessons, lots of images with our legendary BAA educational Captions; we will not sell you junk. 30+ years of long lens experience/e-mail with gear questions.

    BIRDS AS ART Online Store: we will not sell you junk. 35 years of long lens experience. Please e-mail with gear questions.

    Check out the new SONY e-Guide and videos that I did with Patrick Sparkman here. Ten percent discount for BPN members,

    E-mail me at samandmayasgrandpa@att.net.










  14. #14
    Gal Shon
    Guest

    Default

    fantastic! The BG color and the flamingo's match so well.
    Light, colors, sharpness, pose are all superb, well done.
    If anything, I would leave some more space to the right.

  15. #15
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Cheltenham, Glos UK
    Posts
    2,754
    Threads
    206
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Juan,
    Another vote for the tight crop...:D
    Just love those feet...:cool:
    Best,
    Nicki

  16. #16
    Avian Moderator Randy Stout's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    SW Michigan
    Posts
    14,112
    Threads
    820
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Juan:

    I love this pose. When I saw the thumbnail, I thought it must be a vertical that got rotated.

    Lovely techs, another vote for more room to the right.

    Randy

  17. #17
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Auranagabad ( MS ) India
    Posts
    12,833
    Threads
    766
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    this is mindblowing image , loved everything of this:)
    TFS

  18. #18
    IOTY Winner 2010 Chris Kotze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    1,254
    Threads
    137
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Super pose and beautiful colours, sharp and well exposed. Agree on some space on the RHS
    Chris Kotze

  19. #19
    Publisher Arthur Morris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Indian Lake Estates, FL
    Posts
    32,506
    Threads
    1,433
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Randy Stout View Post
    When I saw the thumbnail, I thought it must be a vertical that got rotated. Randy
    Hi Randy, Good to see you posting. Were you thinking that the bird was in flight when you were thinking it was a vertical???
    BIRDS AS ART Blog: great info and lessons, lots of images with our legendary BAA educational Captions; we will not sell you junk. 30+ years of long lens experience/e-mail with gear questions.

    BIRDS AS ART Online Store: we will not sell you junk. 35 years of long lens experience. Please e-mail with gear questions.

    Check out the new SONY e-Guide and videos that I did with Patrick Sparkman here. Ten percent discount for BPN members,

    E-mail me at samandmayasgrandpa@att.net.










  20. #20
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Córdoba, Spain
    Posts
    3,099
    Threads
    211
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks a lot for your comments and suggestions. Much apreciated

    I agree that the bird is a bit tight in the frame (I would crop with more room at the right like several of you suggested) but the amount of detail in this image is so high that I wanted to go for a really tight image and at the end the bird resulted very centered.

    Regarding the bands in the legs. Well I really did not mind for them because in Spain almost 30% of the flamingos are banded due to a very intense an long term bandind research program and bands in the wild flamingos are almost second nature. Of course it is really easy to clone out but I have other images of birds landing with no bands.

    Regarding the performance of the D300 at ISO800 I am really happy with it and I overexpose my images about one stop because the quality of the files overexposed at 800 ISO is fantastic. When I convert the file in RAW I recover the exposure and the noise is really nice. That is the reason why I used ISO800 in this image. By the way, I am wondering why nobody asked about the high ISO with such a good light and the reason is simple. If I use ISO800 I can overexpose my images at f8 and enjoy shutter speed in the range of 1/1650s 1/2500s and that is absolutelly great for birds in flight because you can froze the action and get images that has a lot of potential in the dark room (specially if the images is highly contrasted).
    At low light levels, ISO800 is not great but is better if you can overexpose and, I have to recognaisse, much better than in my beloved D2X. In this image, noise reduction filter was used only in the BG (beacuse it is part of my workflow, but really this image doesn´t need it a lot). There is not noise reduction on the bird and the dark areas are really clean for ISO800 in my opinion.

    D300 is a great improvement in the Nikon lineup but the D3.... oops, I have been shooting with the D3 a couple of hours and it is hard to belive how good the files are at ISO 1000-2500, amazing! (I have several images of birds with the D3 in my blog if someone wants to have a look on it)

    I have received a couple of PM asking for my workflow so I will try to post here the details later :-)

  21. #21
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Córdoba, Spain
    Posts
    3,099
    Threads
    211
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    :D:D:D

    By the way, I forget to say that I like the idea of pano croping a lot, good suggestion :)
    Quote Originally Posted by Arthur Morris View Post
    If the framing is good for Mr. Curry-chek, you know that it is too tight for me

  22. #22
    Publisher Arthur Morris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Indian Lake Estates, FL
    Posts
    32,506
    Threads
    1,433
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Again Juan,

    re:

    I agree that the bird is a bit tight in the frame (I would crop with more room at the right like several of you suggested) but the amount of detail in this image is so high that I wanted to go for a really tight image and at the end the bird resulted very centered.

    At the very least you could crop a bit from the back and add the same amount of canvas in the front. This would yield the same amount of detail with a slightly more pleasing COMP.

    ps: I am glad that you liked the pano suggestion.
    BIRDS AS ART Blog: great info and lessons, lots of images with our legendary BAA educational Captions; we will not sell you junk. 30+ years of long lens experience/e-mail with gear questions.

    BIRDS AS ART Online Store: we will not sell you junk. 35 years of long lens experience. Please e-mail with gear questions.

    Check out the new SONY e-Guide and videos that I did with Patrick Sparkman here. Ten percent discount for BPN members,

    E-mail me at samandmayasgrandpa@att.net.










  23. #23
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Córdoba, Spain
    Posts
    3,099
    Threads
    211
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    My basic workflow is quite simple. I shoot RAW and I use Adobe RAW converter. Since I am shooting the D300 I tend to overexpose my images about one stop in order to get a better performance at high ISO (less noise in processing job).
    Open the RAW file in the converter, adjust the overexposure, noise/sharpening (sometimes I fix noise and sharpness in the RAW converter but in other cases I do that on CS4), a touch of saturation and save as a 16bit TIFF file.
    In CS4 I can add additional rounds of noise reduction or/and sharpening selectively. To do that I work using at least two layers: in the upper layer I made a selection of the bird and delete it then I run noise reduction. This way I can get a noise free BG without affecting the details of the bird. In the lower layer I work on the sharpness.

    Hope this helps.

    The settings of my D300 for birds in flight can be found here: http://www.birdphotographers.net/for...ad.php?t=43648

  24. #24
    Lifetime Member Stu Bowie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Centurion, South Africa
    Posts
    21,360
    Threads
    1,435
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Brilliant IQ Juan, and this is all about the light. The colours look perfect to me, and overall sharp. I would maybe take a bit off the top, and add to the right. Congrats on an outstanding image.

  25. #25
    Super Moderator arash_hazeghi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    San Francisco, California, United States
    Posts
    18,545
    Threads
    1,318
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Wow!!!
    This is one impressive shot. Congrats!

    BTW, if you overexpose 800 by one stop wouldn't this be ISO 400 at 0EV? Is there an advantage of 800 + 1EV versus 400 0EV (shutter speed will be equal):confused:
    Last edited by arash_hazeghi; 08-30-2009 at 05:19 PM.

  26. #26
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Milton Keynes, United Kingdom
    Posts
    1,264
    Threads
    95
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Awesome flight image Juan. I see no problem with plastic rings. The pose is very cool and unique.
    Nice details and colors.

    Szimi

  27. #27
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Córdoba, Spain
    Posts
    3,099
    Threads
    211
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Arash, do not ask me why because I am not very good with those kind of technical details :D. I just can say that the exposure is not the same and you can try by yourself with your camera. Hope this helps and I apologize for delay in responding to your question :)

    Quote Originally Posted by arash_hazeghi View Post
    Wow!!!
    This is one impressive shot. Congrats!

    BTW, if you overexpose 800 by one stop wouldn't this be ISO 400 at 0EV? Is there an advantage of 800 + 1EV versus 400 0EV (shutter speed will be equal):confused:

  28. #28
    Publisher Arthur Morris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Indian Lake Estates, FL
    Posts
    32,506
    Threads
    1,433
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by arash_hazeghi View Post
    BTW, if you overexpose 800 by one stop wouldn't this be ISO 400 at 0EV? Is there an advantage of 800 + 1EV versus 400 0EV (shutter speed will be equal):confused:
    Hi Arash, While I am no technical expert either there is a huge advantage to working at ISO 800 at +1 instead of ISO 400 at zero; there will be much less noise in the former image than in the latter, and the image quality will be far better. Yes, the shutter speeds will be the same but when you lighten the underexposed image created at ISO 400 you will be introducing noise. Your histogram will not have any data in the highlight box on the right....
    BIRDS AS ART Blog: great info and lessons, lots of images with our legendary BAA educational Captions; we will not sell you junk. 30+ years of long lens experience/e-mail with gear questions.

    BIRDS AS ART Online Store: we will not sell you junk. 35 years of long lens experience. Please e-mail with gear questions.

    Check out the new SONY e-Guide and videos that I did with Patrick Sparkman here. Ten percent discount for BPN members,

    E-mail me at samandmayasgrandpa@att.net.










  29. #29
    Avian Moderator Randy Stout's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    SW Michigan
    Posts
    14,112
    Threads
    820
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Artie:

    Glad to see that the bears didn't get you!

    Welcome back.

    Randy

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics