Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Mallard Drake Portrait

  1. #1
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    1,671
    Threads
    140
    Thank You Posts

    Default Mallard Drake Portrait

    Here's an image from last winter. The drake and several other mallards were resting or sleeping on the snow beside a river. I know that it's tight in the frame and I wish that I could have had a clean background but ducks were all around this fellow. I like this image anyway.

    (It was a very cold day laying on that snow!)

    Rebel XT, Sigma 50-500mm @417mm, ISO 200, 1/800 sec. F6.3

    Last edited by Arthur Morris; 02-09-2008 at 08:35 AM. Reason: shot > iimage

  2. #2
    Axel Hildebrandt
    Guest

    Default

    Nice closeup. I like the details and mood. Maybe you would have had no other bird in the frame by moving to your right. I might increase the contrast a few points.

  3. #3
    Jim Johnson
    Guest

    Default

    Great detail in the head and the eye. Have you tried to crop out the other bird, and clone out whats left of the other bird. It would be a little tighter but a great portrait.

    Jim

  4. #4
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Fairfax, Virginia, United States
    Posts
    2,712
    Threads
    299
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Since this is a fairly high key-ish image with a smooth BG, cloning out the extra bird in the BG should be a snap.

  5. #5
    Publisher Arthur Morris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Indian Lake Estates, FL
    Posts
    32,506
    Threads
    1,433
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    If you moved to the right you would have opened up some space between the two birds and more importantly been more square to the bird's head.

    Exposure perfect. Later and love, artie
    BIRDS AS ART Blog: great info and lessons, lots of images with our legendary BAA educational Captions; we will not sell you junk. 30+ years of long lens experience/e-mail with gear questions.

    BIRDS AS ART Online Store: we will not sell you junk. 35 years of long lens experience. Please e-mail with gear questions.

    Check out the new SONY e-Guide and videos that I did with Patrick Sparkman here. Ten percent discount for BPN members,

    E-mail me at samandmayasgrandpa@att.net.










  6. #6
    Judy Lynn Malloch
    Guest

    Default

    Very lovely portrait Stephen and the detail and exposure are excellent as well as wonderful eye contact. Nits mentioned ! thanks for sharing.

  7. #7
    Publisher Arthur Morris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Indian Lake Estates, FL
    Posts
    32,506
    Threads
    1,433
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Judy Lynn Malloch View Post
    Very lovely portrait Stephen and the detail and exposure are excellent as well as wonderful eye contact. Nits mentioned ! thanks for sharing.
    Hi Judy, I disagree with the "wonderful eye contact" comment. With the head turned away, the eye looks sort of glazed (ultra-reflective) to me...

    later and love, artie
    BIRDS AS ART Blog: great info and lessons, lots of images with our legendary BAA educational Captions; we will not sell you junk. 30+ years of long lens experience/e-mail with gear questions.

    BIRDS AS ART Online Store: we will not sell you junk. 35 years of long lens experience. Please e-mail with gear questions.

    Check out the new SONY e-Guide and videos that I did with Patrick Sparkman here. Ten percent discount for BPN members,

    E-mail me at samandmayasgrandpa@att.net.










  8. #8
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Ottawa , On , Canada
    Posts
    156
    Threads
    66
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I believe I was with Stephen when this image was created and as he stated there were ducks all around , hundreds in fact by moving in any direction he would have invited another into the bg , very well done portrait given what you had to work with Stephen ,,, also I agree a tad more contrast would help

  9. #9
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    1,671
    Threads
    140
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    My thanks to everyone for your comments and suggestions. Here's a re-edited version with the OOF duck removed and the contrast increased a little (not enough?)

    Quote Originally Posted by Arthur Morris View Post
    Hi Judy, I disagree with the "wonderful eye contact" comment. With the head turned away, the eye looks sort of glazed (ultra-reflective) to me...

    later and love, artie
    Artie with respect to the glazed eye there was high continuous cloud cover that day and the sun was just starting to burn though the cloud layer. I'm pretty sure that's why the catchlight in the eye was "glazed". Other than waiting for full sunlight can you do anything when the eye looks like this?

    Thanks again to you all


  10. #10
    Publisher Arthur Morris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Indian Lake Estates, FL
    Posts
    32,506
    Threads
    1,433
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Stephen Stephen View Post
    My thanks to everyone for your comments and suggestions. Here's a re-edited version with the OOF duck removed and the contrast increased a little (not enough?) Artie with respect to the glazed eye there was high continuous cloud cover that day and the sun was just starting to burn though the cloud layer. I'm pretty sure that's why the catchlight in the eye was "glazed". Other than waiting for full sunlight can you do anything when the eye looks like this? Thanks again to you all
    Hi Stephen, I do like the repost better but would still have liked for you to be farther right to better parallel the head. Do you see how the base of the bill and the lower part of the face are hidden by the breast? Would the eye have looked "better" if you had moved or the bird had turned? Hard to say but possibly yes. An some instances I will work on an eye like this by selecting it with a QM and then darkening it with a Hue-Sat ADJ (just on the layer): -90 or so on the Sat and -90 or so on the Lightness slide. Then you back off on the opacity slider to lighten the eye somewhat. If you leave the opacity at 100%, esp. with an image like this, you would have the cookie cutter eye with an unnaturally black eye so you would likely have to back of quite a bit to about 20 or 30% to keep it from looking phony.

    It would have been much easier to move to the right or try to squeak the bird to look more towards you :)

    Folks who have bothered to read this will have an idea of why I am such a stickler for head angle (and light angle too). I swear, there are times when I have had a great bird teed up in gorgeous light with a killer BKGR for five minutes but looking away and never made a single image despite my best spishes and duck quacks...

    later and love, artie
    Last edited by Arthur Morris; 02-09-2008 at 04:51 PM.
    BIRDS AS ART Blog: great info and lessons, lots of images with our legendary BAA educational Captions; we will not sell you junk. 30+ years of long lens experience/e-mail with gear questions.

    BIRDS AS ART Online Store: we will not sell you junk. 35 years of long lens experience. Please e-mail with gear questions.

    Check out the new SONY e-Guide and videos that I did with Patrick Sparkman here. Ten percent discount for BPN members,

    E-mail me at samandmayasgrandpa@att.net.










  11. #11
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
    Posts
    1,671
    Threads
    140
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Artie thanks again for all the advice. I'll keep trying with head angles and I'll practice some post processing techniques as suggested.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics