Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: The Cardinal

  1. #1
    BPN Viewer Jeff Cashdollar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Nashville TN
    Posts
    3,490
    Threads
    268
    Thank You Posts

    Default The Cardinal

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Techs:
    Canon 40D
    Canon 400MM 5.6
    f/4.5
    1/400
    ISO=400
    EV==1/3
    HH
    Morning Light

    Work Flow:
    LRII (small crop, desat reds) ---interface CS4 (change WB to daylight, Topaz noise reduction and image recovery, selective sharpen and blurred BG and perch a tad to put focus on subject)
    Last edited by Jeff Cashdollar; 06-25-2009 at 06:01 AM.

  2. #2
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Ahmedabad, Gujarat, INDIA
    Posts
    2,059
    Threads
    319
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    beautiful bird and good light you have got Jeff
    There is some problem i found with the post processing.
    There is a thin border has been seen on the back of the bird. seems you have copied the bird to another layer and by mistake it got shift 1 or 2% left from original place. also the perch is got blurred so much.

    BG is nice. and sharpness to the bird is also good

  3. #3
    BPN Viewer Jeff Cashdollar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Nashville TN
    Posts
    3,490
    Threads
    268
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I did blur the perch some for effect (see workflow narrative), now I regret it, so it goes. Maybe the thin line you see is where I blurred the BG and did not blur the bird, I did it free hand and did not mask the subject, I did not copy the bird to another layer, maybe I should have.
    Last edited by Jeff Cashdollar; 06-25-2009 at 07:47 AM.

  4. #4
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Ahmedabad, Gujarat, INDIA
    Posts
    2,059
    Threads
    319
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    check here

  5. #5
    BPN Viewer Jeff Cashdollar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Nashville TN
    Posts
    3,490
    Threads
    268
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I am on my monitor at work and do not see it, when I get home maybe the detail will surface. I will repost with the perch in a natural state, I do not like the soft look myself (bad ideal) and look into the other issue.
    Last edited by Jeff Cashdollar; 06-25-2009 at 10:08 AM.

  6. #6
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    2,173
    Threads
    219
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Mital, the edge looks more like a sharpening halo to me, as the bird is quite oversharpened. As for the image the HA could be better and the BG is a bit distracting.

  7. #7
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Córdoba, Spain
    Posts
    3,099
    Threads
    211
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    The tiny line that Mital talks about is, most probably, due to the use of Gaussian blur without an adequate selection of the area that you wanted to blur (in this case, the BG). Prior to use Gaussian blur for the BG I duplicate the layer, select the bird and delete it. Then, I invert the selection and apply the Gaussian blur. Once that you have done that, you can deselect the BG and apply sharpenning on the original layer. The only thing to be done is merging both layers at that is all. The perch seems to show a lot of repetitive patterns from cloning job(?)

  8. #8
    Fabs Forns
    Guest

    Default

    Very interesting observation above, Jeff. I will add that I'd like the subject a bit darker.
    Good to see you in Avian :)

  9. #9
    BPN Viewer Jeff Cashdollar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Nashville TN
    Posts
    3,490
    Threads
    268
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    As I stated above, the blur was free hand and I will clean-up tonight and repost. Fabs has taught me the proper routine, I did not use it, thinking free hand would work, it did not. The blurred perch seemed like a good ideal at 10:00 pm last night, it was not. Looking at it now, makes me pause.

    I think its a beautiful Cardinal.
    Last edited by Jeff Cashdollar; 06-25-2009 at 03:39 PM.

  10. #10
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Bradenton, Florida
    Posts
    231
    Threads
    31
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    See what you think of this. Added a little midtone contrast , a little shadows adjustments and just a bit of sharpening..

    I like the HA and the BG. I would have liked just a little more room for the tail..


    Dave
    Last edited by David Smith; 06-25-2009 at 03:48 PM.

  11. #11
    BPN Viewer Jeff Cashdollar's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Nashville TN
    Posts
    3,490
    Threads
    268
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Dave,

    Thank you for the adjustments to the image, I appreciate your help. I believe the OP-Cardinal is regal and beautiful. Pity, I did not do a better job capturing the moment. Your repost is good, might have too much saturation, as you know Cardinals usually require a (-) saturation. I dialed in a (-) 9 to start with, you might be pushing it with the repost. You are correct about the tail; it and the perch both weaken the image.
    Last edited by Jeff Cashdollar; 06-25-2009 at 07:56 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics