Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: House Wren

  1. #1
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Vernon, N.J.
    Posts
    480
    Threads
    76
    Thank You Posts

    Default House Wren

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    This one was nesting in a tiny birdhouse at a relative's front yard. Canon rebel XTi, 500 f4, 580 EX flash, iso 200, f5.6, 1/100, +.33 e.c. from a tripod.

  2. #2
    IOTY Winner 2009 Mark Dumbleton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Johannesburg, South Africa
    Posts
    589
    Threads
    14
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Lovely BG colours, and good detail on the bird. Good use of flash here. Well done

  3. #3
    Avian Moderator Randy Stout's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    SW Michigan
    Posts
    14,112
    Threads
    820
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Herb:

    A sharp little fellow, flash helped bring him up compared with the bright background.
    I might suggest toning down the background and rock a bit to emphasize the bird.

    The HA is very nice, its unfortunate that his rear is so completely blocked by the rock.

    Thanks for sharing.

    Cheers

    Randy

  4. #4
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Argentina
    Posts
    4,234
    Threads
    215
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I agree with Randy here and I would ad that it feels a bit oversharpnend to my taste.
    Great detail, nice light, pose, and BG colors. Congratulations!

  5. #5
    Axel Hildebrandt
    Guest

    Default

    I like the eye contact and angle and agree regarding sharpening. I would also give it more room and the image could go a bit darker for my taste.

  6. #6
    Publisher Arthur Morris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Indian Lake Estates, FL
    Posts
    32,506
    Threads
    1,433
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Loverly SH, BKGR, and HA. Too, too tight in the frame. Randy, I think that your rock might be a branch....
    BIRDS AS ART Blog: great info and lessons, lots of images with our legendary BAA educational Captions; we will not sell you junk. 30+ years of long lens experience/e-mail with gear questions.

    BIRDS AS ART Online Store: we will not sell you junk. 35 years of long lens experience. Please e-mail with gear questions.

    Check out the new SONY e-Guide and videos that I did with Patrick Sparkman here. Ten percent discount for BPN members,

    E-mail me at samandmayasgrandpa@att.net.










  7. #7
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Vernon, N.J.
    Posts
    480
    Threads
    76
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Thanks for the comments everyone. I left image at full frame instead of cropping, reduced the sharpening and darkened, repaired halos in the BG a bit. The tip of it's tail is just visible below the branch.

  8. #8
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Posts
    58
    Threads
    12
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I'm personally not a fan of the flashed look, I'd rather see a little less flash for a little more tonal variation between the upper and lower parts of the bird as though the primary light were from the sky.

  9. #9
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Location
    South-Africa
    Posts
    957
    Threads
    66
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Branch it is hehehe. Well done on this. You did great agree on a bit tight. Like randy's version I would just add the space

  10. #10
    IOTY Winner 2010 Chris Kotze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2008
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    1,254
    Threads
    137
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Great close up and super colours. Your new comp looks fine
    Chris Kotze

  11. #11
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Vernon, N.J.
    Posts
    480
    Threads
    76
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Doug Herr View Post
    I'm personally not a fan of the flashed look, I'd rather see a little less flash for a little more tonal variation between the upper and lower parts of the bird as though the primary light were from the sky.
    As the bird was under the canopy of the tree, light from the sky was not an option, just soft filtered light. Without the flash, the shot would have weak light and therefore wouldn't work at all. Thanks for commenting.

  12. #12
    Publisher Arthur Morris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Indian Lake Estates, FL
    Posts
    32,506
    Threads
    1,433
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Herb Houghton View Post
    As the bird was under the canopy of the tree, light from the sky was not an option, just soft filtered light. Without the flash, the shot would have weak light and therefore wouldn't work at all. Thanks for commenting.
    Hi Herb, First off, I like the full frame image much better than the tightly cropped one.

    Your comment above might have been true with film, but is in no way correct with digital. While flash can at times improve an image slightly, properly optimized images taken in low light can be superb and often look as good or better than flashed images from the same sequence. But only after being properly optimized.
    BIRDS AS ART Blog: great info and lessons, lots of images with our legendary BAA educational Captions; we will not sell you junk. 30+ years of long lens experience/e-mail with gear questions.

    BIRDS AS ART Online Store: we will not sell you junk. 35 years of long lens experience. Please e-mail with gear questions.

    Check out the new SONY e-Guide and videos that I did with Patrick Sparkman here. Ten percent discount for BPN members,

    E-mail me at samandmayasgrandpa@att.net.










Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics