Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 51 to 56 of 56

Thread: Pileated with chicks

  1. #51
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    North Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
    Posts
    313
    Threads
    58
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    excellent shot, really impressive.
    I was recently at a Pileated nest site and it was waits of up to an hour like you say.
    I only wish for the close view and great light you got here.

  2. #52
    c.w. moynihan
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Charles Glatzer View Post
    BTW- the crest color as posted appears a bit orange and should be altered to be more red. You guys are slipping ;)

    Warmest Regards to all,

    Chas
    And is the orange hue a result of the sRGB conversion ? I bet it looks more red in Adobe RGB working space correct ? I find red does this when going from Adobe RGB working space to a sRGB conversion viewed on a sRGB monitor. How do you compensate for this for web (sRGB) viewing (Hue slider more green/blue ?). TIA Chas.

  3. #53
    BPN Viewer Charles Glatzer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    1,690
    Threads
    363
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by c.w. moynihan View Post
    And is the orange hue a result of the sRGB conversion ? I bet it looks more red in Adobe RGB working space correct ? I find red does this when going from Adobe RGB working space to a sRGB conversion viewed on a sRGB monitor. How do you compensate for this for web (sRGB) viewing (Hue slider more green/blue ?). TIA Chas.

    Chris,

    Yes, the red appears closer to reality in Pro RGB than when converted to sRGB for posting. The Hue slider is the way to go.

    Best,

    Chas

  4. #54
    Lifetime Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Castlegar, BC Canada
    Posts
    373
    Threads
    46
    Thank You Posts

    Default Note to photographers, please learn the bird...

    Quote Originally Posted by Christopher C.M. Cooke View Post
    I am so far from being a competent critique person that I almost feel embarrassed posting here BUT!

    ....to a person who knows little of this bird I don’t find it all that interesting as though the adult is obviously trying to feed the young there is no food evident.
    I have been lurking here for a while, but I registered on this site specifically to comment on C. Cookes thoughts about this image. I am a biologist married to someone who posts here, so I hope I don't blacken the family name. Most people who post here surely know that images of Pileated Woodpecker young are exceptionally difficult to get, it is noted in the description that a tree platform was used. This species used to be blue-listed in BC and although the adults stick out like sore thumbs, even though they are considered rare, and are unmistakable to the average observer, they are quite secretive about thier nest sites, which are usually quite high up in very large deciduous trees. Impossible, in other words, to photograph. I can attest to the fact that the colors are accurate. Spot on, actually. Also, not all interaction between adults and fledglings are feeding behaviours.

    This is a great image and a rare capture.

    Kat Enns, RPBio., MSc. Castlegar,BC.

  5. #55
    BPN Viewer Charles Glatzer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    1,690
    Threads
    363
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Kat,

    I appreciate the input. Thank you for your reply. I have been trying to capture this particular pair nesting for the past 6 years, as well as others. And, was elated to find them this year doing so in such a wonderfully accessible spot. The adults would alternate typically returning after approx an hour gathering bugs with their beak completely filled. I have images with food being transferred, chicks poking their heads out of the nesting hole, etc. It was an experience I will not forget. I was told the chicks have now fledged, and are doing well.

    Warmest Regards,

    Chas
    Last edited by Charles Glatzer; 06-19-2009 at 09:35 PM.

  6. #56
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Posts
    50
    Threads
    1
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    First off, sweet image Chas.

    Quote Originally Posted by Charles Glatzer View Post
    I apply a generic horz/vert web action that includes resizing, creative edge mask and high-pass sharpening, copyright, drop shadow, and un-flattened conversion to sRGB.
    On the eyes. I've not photographed this species extensively but images I have of the nestlings typically show mostly dark eyes and not the yellow iris the adults do so I don't think lightening the eyes would be an accurate representation of the scene unless of course the eyes were actually brighter.

    On the post processing for posting I'm with Chas. While I'd love to have the time to spend to tweak each image individually for jpeg display I am more concerned with the processing of the original that will hopefully be used for printing or publication. I simply don't have the time to do so and use an action similar but I'm sure is not as refined as Chas's. I have found that if you want to, you can often make a relatively soft image sparkle as a small jpeg so when I look at an image online I try to "judge" it by the composition, subject, lighting, habitat, backround etc and not too much on just how sharp it appears etc.

    Having said that, I do appreciate an image that has been fine tuned for posting as well but pretty much discount any minor sharpening halos etc as long as they aren't distracting.:)

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics