Results 1 to 17 of 17

Thread: Piping Plover chicks under parent

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Nashua, New Hampshire, United States
    Posts
    1,280
    Threads
    260
    Thank You Posts

    Default Piping Plover chicks under parent

    I shot piping plover chicks over the weekend. Conditions were cloudy.
    Chicks are fun to watch - they move very quickly and are hard to focus on with a long lens and tc as they tend to blend in with the background. Of course, sometimes they blend in with a parent.



    D300 600mm with 1.4 tc 1/400 at f 7.1 +7 ev (auto) iso at 900.
    Last edited by allanrube; 06-12-2009 at 08:52 AM.

  2. #2
    Avian Moderator Randy Stout's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    SW Michigan
    Posts
    14,112
    Threads
    820
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Allan:

    I like it. Nice that you captured the rare "octaplover". It looks like some odd science fiction creature.

    Nice light, HA, exposure and overall sharpness. Great low angle. I might hit the eye one more time with USM, as it doesn't seem quite as sharp as the bill and wing area.

    Might consider cleaning up the debris by the tail.

    Really cute. Thanks for sharing!

    Randy

  3. #3
    Axel Hildebrandt
    Guest

    Default

    Great capture of this behavior. If I remember correctly, piping plover chicks can't keep up their body temperature and need to warm up once in a while.

    I like the angle and eye contact and would apply some CW rotation. The catchlight looks quite big.

  4. #4
    Forum Participant Manos Papadomanolakis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Crete Greece
    Posts
    3,408
    Threads
    179
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I like the angle,eye contact and the soft light!

  5. #5
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    Bangalore, Karnataka
    Posts
    3,800
    Threads
    236
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Great capture this, loved the moment, and the angle on this one. Congrats.

  6. #6
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    413
    Threads
    95
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    very nice scene. However, I agree with the other, I would also get rid of the debris by the tail...and additionally you have to work on the eye. Because you didnÄt mention flash I assume you put that catch light in the eye. For my taste it's much too big and the eye still looks dead. I would consider to work on the eye seperately, brighten it and then see what you can do. Such a strong catchlight with no visible sun in the image is quite akward.

  7. #7
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Cleveland, Ohio
    Posts
    501
    Threads
    73
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Wow - what a fun image with all the chicks crowded around. The debris doesn't bother me. Does it need a bit of CW rotation? Could just be a slope in the sand though. Very nice.

  8. #8
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Nashua, New Hampshire, United States
    Posts
    1,280
    Threads
    260
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Matthew, it was fun shooting the chicks. I have a lot of single chicks in the sand too. Axel, yes, they do this to keep warm. After perhaps three minutes, the parent would squawk, stand up, and the chicks would come out for 7-10 minutes.

    How is this as a repost?

  9. #9
    Tell Dickinson
    Guest

    Default

    Smashing shot Allan, love everything about it but all those legs obviously make it that little bit special.

  10. #10
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Argentina
    Posts
    4,234
    Threads
    215
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Lovely image, very cute scene and preety great natural moment, lovely detail, comp, low angle, light and BG. Congratulations!

  11. #11
    Fabs Forns
    Guest

    Default

    That is an adorable image. I feel the repost is too tight at the bottom, not enough room in proportion to the size of the subjects.

  12. #12
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Milton Keynes, United Kingdom
    Posts
    1,264
    Threads
    95
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Fully agree with Jan on the catchlight. It is dominant and obviously fake reading the conditions of the image.
    Despite there is no catchlight on the repost I still like it much better than the original one.
    By the way, the image is so sweet and funny.

    Wish for a bit more room under the feet.

    Szimi

  13. #13
    BPN Member Morkel Erasmus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    14,858
    Threads
    1,235
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    this is great! very cute, superb low angle and strong composition makes this shot special for me. don't mind debris that much, the surroundings are very clean and the 'octaplover' ;) stands out nicely.

  14. #14
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    Washington, D.C.
    Posts
    1,225
    Threads
    14
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I just love this image. The low angle was essential to seeing what's going on. If I count correctly, there are four little plovers tucked under there. Well-done!! :D

    One small criticism, and I do mean small. These little repetitions are a tipoff that Mr. Clone has been in the neighborhood. Most people probably wouldn't notice them. Some (like me) will, though, and the challenge is always to go in and get out like a thief in the night, leaving nary a clue that you were ever there.


  15. #15
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Merida, Yucatan,Mexico
    Posts
    2,809
    Threads
    453
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Wonderful shot. Very cute with the chicks hiding there. Nice low angle, light, BG, comp. I like the repost, though it is a little tight for my taste. Congratulations.

  16. #16
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Nashua, New Hampshire, United States
    Posts
    1,280
    Threads
    260
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    David, thanks for the mention of cloning. The foreground was messy - I will go back and work some more.
    I also agree there needs to be more space at the bottom.

  17. #17
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Nashua, New Hampshire, United States
    Posts
    1,280
    Threads
    260
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    OK - another repost.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics