Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: New Canon 1DMIII Fix

  1. #1
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Somers, NY
    Posts
    480
    Threads
    11
    Thank You Posts

    Default New Canon 1DMIII Fix

    From Rob Galbraith

    http://www.robgalbraith.com/bins/mul...8740-9068-9264

    Maybe they will get it right this time.

  2. #2
    Alfred Forns
    Guest

    Default

    Very glad to hear !!!!! Will be significant The MK3 is a significant camera as far as quality is concern Once the AF is consistently good it will take its rightful place This does gives me a chuckle all the previous debate about good bodies and bad bodies?

  3. #3
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Sawbridgeworth, Herts. UK
    Posts
    186
    Threads
    29
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Didn't know my camera still had problems :eek: ;) :D

    and I thought it was just me...... now I can blame the camera :D ..... Who am i trying to fool it's me :) ;)

  4. #4
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Milton Keynes, United Kingdom
    Posts
    1,264
    Threads
    95
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    After being familiar with this problem for more than half a year we still read comemnts like this 'maybe this time...'. It is unbelievable from such a large company how they play with their clients. No question to switch to NIKON.:eek::confused::(
    Szimi

  5. #5
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Somers, NY
    Posts
    480
    Threads
    11
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alfred Forns View Post
    Very glad to hear !!!!! Will be significant The MK3 is a significant camera as far as quality is concern Once the AF is consistently good it will take its rightful place This does gives me a chuckle all the previous debate about good bodies and bad bodies?
    Al,

    You are correct but that means it has taken Canon almost 1 year to fix a problem which according to them did not exist. Black is getting better looking all the time. But then you know that. :D

  6. #6
    BPN Viewer Charles Glatzer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    NC
    Posts
    1,690
    Threads
    363
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    You all know what happens if you keep a tourniquet on too long!!!!!!!!!

    Chas

  7. #7
    Art Peslak
    Guest

    Default

    Of couse this had to be leaked just when i put my Mark III's up for sale on ebay.

  8. #8
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Somers, NY
    Posts
    480
    Threads
    11
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Art Peslak View Post
    Of couse this had to be leaked just when i put my Mark III's up for sale on ebay.
    Canon wants you to stay on the white side :D

  9. #9
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Kingston, Wa. USA
    Posts
    1,106
    Threads
    227
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Interesting, Bob--I am happy with my camera since its return from the first "fix" anything more will be gravy for me.
    I am getting the best images I have ever taken with it.

  10. #10
    Alfred Forns
    Guest

    Default

    Art if you look at both right now D3 and Mk3 Aside from the AF issue there are many things that make it a more desirable camera

    51 Point AF that you can move one point in any direction including diagonally
    Easy to see histogram in bright light
    Cleaner ISO
    Better ergonomics
    Edge in AF performance
    Having the 200-400 available

    Lots more but just touched on a few I have been very happy since my switch and gad I did When I made my decision back in September I was aware a solution to the MK3 had to be found Never thought it would take this long!!!! I got to use over twenty Mk3 (from different persons) and did not find a single one that was performing as it was advertised Actually there were several owners said focused perfectly and when (I tried) shooting flight sequences they were not

    Any way this time I feel the camera will be fixed and will perform as good as the MK2n The image quality from these 14 bit cameras is amazing !!!!

  11. #11
    Art Peslak
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alfred Forns View Post
    Art if you look at both right now D3 and Mk3 Aside from the AF issue there are many things that make it a more desirable camera

    51 Point AF that you can move one point in any direction including diagonally
    Easy to see histogram in bright light
    Cleaner ISO
    Better ergonomics
    Edge in AF performance
    Having the 200-400 available

    Lots more but just touched on a few I have been very happy since my switch and gad I did When I made my decision back in September I was aware a solution to the MK3 had to be found Never thought it would take this long!!!! I got to use over twenty Mk3 (from different persons) and did not find a single one that was performing as it was advertised Actually there were several owners said focused perfectly and when (I tried) shooting flight sequences they were not

    Any way this time I feel the camera will be fixed and will perform as good as the MK2n The image quality from these 14 bit cameras is amazing !!!!
    Thanks Alfred. I had a D3 Delivered with the 200-400 this week.
    My fixed mark iii and the blue dot Mark iii just plain would not hold focus for birds in flight. It looked better in the viewfinder like it was locking focus but the focus would oscillate in and out of focus when I looked at the images on the computer. I made my decision to go back to black before this announcement and I am not going to wait another 3 or 4 months to see if canon really has the answer this time.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics