Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Greenfinch

  1. #1
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Sawbridgeworth, Herts. UK
    Posts
    186
    Threads
    29
    Thank You Posts

    Default Greenfinch

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Taken today at a local nature reserve.
    EOS 1DMKIII, EF 100-400 + 1.4 converter, ISO400, 1/60th sec f8 Handheld. Dull & overcast
    Adjusted levels, added some USM and cropped.
    Last edited by Pete Woods; 02-03-2008 at 06:31 AM.

  2. #2
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Fairfax, Virginia, United States
    Posts
    2,712
    Threads
    299
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    That's a nice little bird but the BG takes away from him a good bit. Did you sharpen the whole thing or just the bird? There is a good bit of noise in the BG that could be dealt with. I might darken the BG around the subject a little too.

  3. #3
    Axel Hildebrandt
    Guest

    Default

    Nice pose and eye contact. I find the BG a bit busy and it looks as if you sharpened it, which caused a lot of noise. I would apply some NR on the BG to reduce it. Fill flash would have helped in this situation and you would have gotten a nice catchlight.

  4. #4
    Publisher Arthur Morris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Indian Lake Estates, FL
    Posts
    32,506
    Threads
    1,433
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Well done but for the noise and the need for a bit more head turn. That is a lot of noise for ISO 400 on a MIII image. Was the ORIG way underexposed???

    later and love, artie
    BIRDS AS ART Blog: great info and lessons, lots of images with our legendary BAA educational Captions; we will not sell you junk. 30+ years of long lens experience/e-mail with gear questions.

    BIRDS AS ART Online Store: we will not sell you junk. 35 years of long lens experience. Please e-mail with gear questions.

    Check out the new SONY e-Guide and videos that I did with Patrick Sparkman here. Ten percent discount for BPN members,

    E-mail me at samandmayasgrandpa@att.net.










  5. #5
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Sawbridgeworth, Herts. UK
    Posts
    186
    Threads
    29
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Arthur Morris View Post
    Well done but for the noise and the need for a bit more head turn. That is a lot of noise for ISO 400 on a MIII image. Was the ORIG way underexposed???

    later and love, artie
    Yes it was under exposed. I was in a hide under trees, so the light was poor hence the shutter speed. I must admit to concentrating on the bird and have not paid much attention to the BG..

    Axel, I don't think using a flash would have gone down well with the birders in the hide.


    Thanks all for your feedback :)

  6. #6
    Publisher Arthur Morris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Indian Lake Estates, FL
    Posts
    32,506
    Threads
    1,433
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Pete Woods View Post
    Yes it was under exposed. Thanks all for your feedback :)
    Ah, as I suspected. When you underexpose an image and then lighten it in Photoshop you are making it noisier. With the MIII I would have gone to ISO 1600 and added light until I had at least some data in the 5th histogram box. Youu say "handheld." Were you resting the lens on the opening of the hide?

    later and love, artie
    BIRDS AS ART Blog: great info and lessons, lots of images with our legendary BAA educational Captions; we will not sell you junk. 30+ years of long lens experience/e-mail with gear questions.

    BIRDS AS ART Online Store: we will not sell you junk. 35 years of long lens experience. Please e-mail with gear questions.

    Check out the new SONY e-Guide and videos that I did with Patrick Sparkman here. Ten percent discount for BPN members,

    E-mail me at samandmayasgrandpa@att.net.










  7. #7
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Sawbridgeworth, Herts. UK
    Posts
    186
    Threads
    29
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Arthur Morris View Post
    Ah, as I suspected. When you underexpose an image and then lighten it in Photoshop you are making it noisier. With the MIII I would have gone to ISO 1600 and added light until I had at least some data in the 5th histogram box. Youu say "handheld." Were you resting the lens on the opening of the hide?

    later and love, artie
    Artie thanks again, I think I was resting my elbow on the hide but not the lens..

    ISO 1600, I will give this a go.. Might pop back there today :)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics