Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Marsh Wren

  1. #1
    BPN Viewer Dave Leroy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Delta, BC
    Posts
    3,789
    Threads
    380
    Thank You Posts

    Default Marsh Wren

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Taken about a month ago at Wellington Point Park. 50D, 400/5.6 at 5.6, 1/500. ISO400, flash and BB. I didn't dare try to remove the bit of fluff on the reed below wren.
    Dave

  2. #2
    Fabs Forns
    Guest

    Default

    Nice fluffy pose and good head angle. BG is busy, but the monochrome helps there. Sharp where it needs to be.

  3. #3
    Super Moderator Daniel Cadieux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    26,273
    Threads
    3,977
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Agree with the busy BG, with the two bigger culprits being the horizontal stem touching the belly and the pale vertical one along the right edge. However this is pretty much where how we usually find them anyhow...perhaps you can get one to climb up a reed and clear of the BG for you :-) Good exposure and sharpness on this ffella. It looks pretty relaxed considering how vocal and twitchy they can be.

  4. #4
    Lifetime Member Stu Bowie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Centurion, South Africa
    Posts
    21,360
    Threads
    1,435
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Dave, great use of flash, as the exposure looks good, with lovely detail. I do find the BG a bit busy as Dan has pointed out. There again, we cant choose their BG anyway.

  5. #5
    BPN Member Steve Maxson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Bemidji, Minnesota
    Posts
    5,801
    Threads
    818
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I like the relaxed pose, light, and comp, Dave. I'm OK with the background because this is where they live (and it really doesn't appear objectionably "busy" to me) - with the exception of the horizontal stem pointed out by Daniel. I would also suggest toning down the two light areas to the left of the bird.

  6. #6
    BPN Viewer Dave Leroy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Delta, BC
    Posts
    3,789
    Threads
    380
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks everyone for comments. This photo, I just noticed is way too saturated for me. I use CS3 for processing and BBrowser for management. When I finished this morning and saved for web, in BB file appeared very flat compared to completed file in CS3. I still had file open in CS3 and went through iterations of up sat by increments of 5 to get BB to match CS3 file. I ended up at sat+20. Now when I see this file, and compare to BB it is too sat. I had not noticed thsi before. Dave

  7. #7
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Newton MA, USA
    Posts
    1,956
    Threads
    144
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Nice image Dave,
    I really like it!

    When it comes to removing the fluff, Quick Mask
    in combination with Healing Tool is the way to go IMHO.
    Artie's Digital Basics has it explained nicely.
    Here is my humble attempt by many QM and Healing touches.
    Do you think it is worth it?

  8. #8
    BPN Viewer Dave Leroy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Delta, BC
    Posts
    3,789
    Threads
    380
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Ahh yes, that is much better. Thank you Ilija. I do have Digital Basics so will review that. Tks, Dave

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics