In addition to general comments/critiques, I'd be curious about folks' preference between versions, the "bird on a stick" (posted) and the "bird on a stick, plus stick" -- http://www.geocities.com/tgrey41/Phainopepla3x.jpg .
Taken in Anza-Borrego Park, east of San Diego. 20D, 500/4 + 1.4s, 1/1000, f/6.3, ISO 400.
Hi Tom! Great first post. This image is full of detail, so sharp. I'm a fan of the bird on a stick, plus stick. I think that version fills the frame a little more nicely, and doesn't draw my eye away from your subject. In this version there are some noticable cloning artifacts, just bits and pieces of the branch structure still visible :)
Great first post, Tom. I like the details and exposure control. I don't think the second stick adds to the image but agree that there are cloning marks. Keep them coming.
Welcom Tom . Its great to have you and a wonderful first post. Love it that the crest is up and the detail and eye contact is excellent . Nits have been mentioned. Look forward to future posts !!
Thanks for the welcome, folks, and also the good advice -- especially Robert's about protecting the head and darkening the image, which I am going to try now. Thanks to all for noticing my hasty cloning:o. I redid it more carefully and I think it looks ok now on my website, though I'd be happy to learn Robert's different methods. I end up slightly preferring the single stick version, as did most of you.