Happy Easter to all:
I have noticed different histogram results when looking at images in different programs. I use Nikon NX2 primarily. I just commented on a nice Northern Shoveller image from Mike Lentz, that the breast looked a bit hot on my monitor, and in NX2 there were def. a few blown pixels in the red channel. It showed up when you used the blown highlight feature. Kim Rollins just replied that he didn't see any in PS, at least on the histogram.
Have others noticed this discrepancy in how different programs read the histograms, or perhaps it is just the case that when only a few pixels are toasted, the spike on the histogram is usually too small to be seen, while it will show up on the blown highlight screen?
Thanks!
Randy







Reply With Quote

