Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Ring-billed Gull

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    23,119
    Threads
    1,523
    Thank You Posts
    Blog Entries
    55

    Default Ring-billed Gull

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Canon 5D
    500 +1.4
    ISO 200
    1/3200 sec. at f/6.3
    Tripod low to ground

    Shot on the same day as previous posts-that's why the 200 ISO
    I was shooting ducks in the pond when he came in

    Is the wing position acceptable?
    Are the shadows unacceptable?
    Should I burn the rim of the wing, even though it isn't showing up hot on LR2?
    Thanks in advance.

  2. #2
    Axel Hildebrandt
    Guest

    Default

    I like the details and his carry-on. The shutter speed is perfectly fine. The wing position of the far wing is not ideal but since there is no head/wing overlap I don't mind it. I might remove the sheen from the mussel.

  3. #3
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    23,119
    Threads
    1,523
    Thank You Posts
    Blog Entries
    55

    Default

    Axel, I didn't even think about that-thanks will do!

  4. #4
    Nate Chappell
    Guest

    Default

    Lovely shot Denise, I like your comp and the mussel adds a lot to it, the shadows aren't dark enough to bother me.

  5. #5
    Super Moderator Daniel Cadieux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    26,273
    Threads
    3,977
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Nice one Denise. I suppose the far wing could have a better position, but as is I like the swooping shape of it. The mussel is a nice plus :-)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics