Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Cuban Pygmy Owl

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Nova Scotia, Canada
    Posts
    1,065
    Threads
    347
    Thank You Posts

    Default Cuban Pygmy Owl

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    This was a digiscoped image, with a Sony DSC-W5 point-and-shoot, using an adapter wedged into the 30X eyepiece of a Kowa 773 spotting scope, and then hand-held to actually depress the shutter. ISO100, 1/160, f4.5. The owl was sharp, but in the original image there were branches sticking out of its head, and a very fussy leafy background, as this was deep in the woods. So this image is the result of quite a bit of cloning and background-blurring, but I'm still not entirely happy with it. I also had to add canvas at the top, as the top of the owl's head was close to the top of the frame. Comments welcome.

    Richard
    Last edited by Richard Stern; 03-07-2009 at 08:02 PM. Reason: Removed a blemish from the image

  2. #2
    Gail Spitler
    Guest

    Default

    Hi Richard
    Thanks for posting this image. It is interesting to me to see this owl and mine (above) both photographically and in terms of the two species. I am not sure but I think the lack of refined sharpness (sharpness that brings out fine feather detail) is caused by the small sensor and the need for noise reduction. I am not sure why, but there is something unnatural or forced in the image. The contrast seems too forceful.
    Sorry I can't help more.
    Cheers
    Gail

  3. #3
    Lance Peters
    Guest

    Default

    Hi - you cannot judge this image in the same way as you would a DSLR image - this was taken on a Point and shoot camera through a spotting scope (Digiscoped) the image is going to be inherently more noiser due to the small sensor on the camera and the act of taking a photograph of a object appearing in the eyepeice of a spotting scope.

    It is quite noisey (as expected) PS work looks quite good. How far away were you from this guy :)

  4. #4
    KurtPreston
    Guest

    Default

    This is actually quite lovely for a digiscoped image! The grainy quality works for me in this, good job. A real good job of blurring the background ... I would have expected a noticable halo.

  5. #5
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    8,458
    Threads
    682
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Very cool comp Richard and nice look from over the shoulder. You did a good job with the BG. Never seen this type of owl, thanks for sharing.

  6. #6
    Gus Cobos
    Guest

    Default

    Hi Richard,
    I like your composition, image and capture of this fine little guy...The image looks very good, the level of noise is normal coming from the digiscoped point and shoot...I like the expression on his face...looking forward to some more...:cool:

  7. #7
    Alberto Oria
    Guest

    Default

    I thought, shooting with a scope with adapter would produce a much inferior image. a 30x it would be like a 1000 mm lens to a aps-c sensor and hand held. Congrats I am impressed.

  8. #8
    Alfred Forns
    Guest

    Default

    Amazing image with the equipment !!! I'm sure took careful planing !!! Agree with comments and can try also lightening the left eye a bit !!! Got keeper !!!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics