Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Canon 1D(s) Mark III - New AF Fix (U.S.)

  1. #1
    Axel Hildebrandt
    Guest

    Default Canon 1D(s) Mark III - New AF Fix (U.S.)


  2. #2
    Robert Amoruso
    Guest

    Default

    Wow,

    Semi-official acknowledgment that the AF system is funky. I was just getting ready to send mine in for re-calibration and a sticky lens lock pin.

  3. #3
    c.w. moynihan
    Guest

    Default

    Thanks Axel..I missed this post. Great timimg for us...send it in while spring migration is about to start. Guess I will wait until spring is over before I send mine in.

  4. #4
    Lifetime Member Doug Brown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM
    Posts
    11,879
    Threads
    917
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    No rush for me, since I use center point only and center point AF is quite good on mine. I'll still send it in for the fix though.
    Upcoming Workshops: Bosque del Apache 2019, Ecuador 2020 (details coming soon)
    Website -
    Facebook - 500px

  5. #5
    Co-Founder James Shadle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Valrico, Fl
    Posts
    5,108
    Threads
    1,419
    Thank You Posts
    Blog Entries
    11

    Default

    WOW another new fix:confused:.

    I'm sure the Mark IV or V will autofocus as well as the 50D does.

  6. #6
    Super Moderator arash_hazeghi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    San Francisco, California, United States
    Posts
    18,545
    Threads
    1,318
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Guys, I came close to purchasing the 1DMKIII just for BIF several times, every time I backed off after seeing the internet reports of AF not being able to perform as advertised (especialy the famous Rob Galbraith report), what is your opinion? Do you have problems tracking with 1DIII? For now I am using my 40D but I love to have a pro birding body :)

  7. #7
    Banned
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Colorado
    Posts
    3,949
    Threads
    254
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    This is kind of scary. I thought it was fixed last time. I hesitated on the 1DIII (having a 1DII).
    It makes me concerned about a 1D4. Why so long and so many tries to get it fixed?

  8. #8
    Axel Hildebrandt
    Guest

    Default

    I think the problem is that we have to speculate. Maybe it's a cultural issue, but I would prefer to know that they know about problems and work on it. I read several times that people even hope that Canon silently fixes AF issues in new firmware versions without acknowledging them. If customers think like that then you know that you have a real problem.

  9. #9
    Lifetime Member Doug Brown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM
    Posts
    11,879
    Threads
    917
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I find that the Mark III does very well for BIF.
    Upcoming Workshops: Bosque del Apache 2019, Ecuador 2020 (details coming soon)
    Website -
    Facebook - 500px

  10. #10
    Co-Founder James Shadle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Valrico, Fl
    Posts
    5,108
    Threads
    1,419
    Thank You Posts
    Blog Entries
    11

    Default

    Doug,
    Are you a center sensor man?
    James

  11. #11
    Lifetime Member Doug Brown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM
    Posts
    11,879
    Threads
    917
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Yes James, I am.
    Upcoming Workshops: Bosque del Apache 2019, Ecuador 2020 (details coming soon)
    Website -
    Facebook - 500px

  12. #12
    Cliff Beittel
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Doug Brown View Post
    Yes James, I am [a center sensor guy].
    I'd say 1/43rd of a camera's autofocus function is nothing to crow about. My 1Ds mark III also did fine for flight shooting using the center sensor; now I finally understand why so many "easy" static shots were soft--my usual practice is to manually select the sensor over the eye after composing, so that the servo AF can react to any small change in head position. If they just hadn't provided those other 42 sensors, which worked so well on the EOS-3 and EOS-1Ds mark II, all would have been well.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics