Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Another Sandhill Portrait

  1. #1
    BPN Viewer Dave Leroy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Delta, BC
    Posts
    3,789
    Threads
    380
    Thank You Posts

    Default Another Sandhill Portrait

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Taken yesterday at Riefel B.S. just south of Vanc., BC. There was some rain and sleet and birds were feeding in wet grass beside a small pond/slough. 50D, 400/5.6 at f/8, 1/500, EC+1 1/3, ISO800. Iwas surprised at the difference in head colors between the post earlier today by Steve and this bird. Dave

  2. #2
    joel quenneville
    Guest

    Default

    You have a good pose here Dave. The feather detail is great, your exposure is good and the framing really compliments the pose. I would suggest some Shadow & Highlights and adding some saturation to make the head "pop" and draw the viewers eye directly to the center of attention.

  3. #3
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    6,829
    Threads
    569
    Thank You Posts

    Default repost

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    I took some of Joel's suggestions and came up with this

  4. #4
    BPN Member Steve Maxson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Bemidji, Minnesota
    Posts
    5,801
    Threads
    818
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Nice sharpness and detail here, Dave. I like the vertical crop though I would be tempted to take even more from the right. I also like the repost as it brightens things up overall.
    I see what you mean about the difference from my image. I think that your bird is a Lesser Sandhill (note how short the neck is compared to mine which is a Greater Sandhill). Also note how much farther back on the head the red goes on my bird compared to yours. I don't know that this is a subspecies difference, but it might be due to age. Possibly your bird is is a yearling in the process of shedding the feathers on the top of its head (this last bit is speculation as I don't know precisely when or how the young cranes shed those head feathers). If all the birds you were observing had heads like this, then my speculation wouldn't apply. :)

  5. #5
    BPN Viewer Dave Leroy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Delta, BC
    Posts
    3,789
    Threads
    380
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks Joel for the suggestions and Dave for the repost. Yes, it looks much better and I have gone back and changed my copy. Tks
    Interesting Steve, I had not caught the distinction between Greater and Lesser SHills. I just reviewed my photo collection of the small local resident flock and I do see head markings similiar to your photo. Guess I better pay attention. Dave

  6. #6
    Jon Thornton
    Guest

    Default

    I hate to be contrary, but I actually prefer the first version. The muted colours in the first image look more realistic.

  7. #7
    BPN Viewer Dave Leroy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Delta, BC
    Posts
    3,789
    Threads
    380
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Jon, Tricky business isn't it, trying to learn the "best" presentation for a photo. You are right that the first post is closer to how I saw the birds and is more realistic in that sense. Which is the better presentation? I don't know. We all do so many mod's on our photos as we process them that perhaps some of the reality is always chucked out the window. Beauty in the eye of the beholder I suppose. I had posted a similiar photo the day before and thought i had over done the head, and therefore toned this one down. My intention was to try and present the soft look of the feathers through out the photo. That is the long story.
    I really appreciate your looking and commenting. Thanks, Dave

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics