Results 1 to 13 of 13

Thread: Pretty boy

  1. #1
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Costa Mesa, CA
    Posts
    1,289
    Threads
    445
    Thank You Posts

    Default Pretty boy

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    D70s 70-200VR 2X @400 1/1600 f5.6 ISO400 -2/3EV

    Got out this morning after a few days of cold wind and rain here. Caught this colorful little feller doing some serious fishing. The image is cropped and sharpened, only.

    Wendell

  2. #2
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    8,458
    Threads
    682
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hard bird to expose for Wendell. Think you are a bit over on both ends???? Love the reflection and might add a bit more canvas to the bottom if you have it. Love these birds, they rarely stay still.

  3. #3
    Gus Cobos
    Guest

    Default

    Hi Wendell,
    I like the capture...a few things to consider...agree with Jackie on adding canvas to the bottom...also might want to position the duck on the upper left hand side of the frame, just a tad...the hot spots on the duck need to be toned down and the water is a bit under exposed; might want to lighten it up a tad...I like the head angle and eye contact...the colors are beautiful...looking forward to your next one...:cool:

  4. #4
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Costa Mesa, CA
    Posts
    1,289
    Threads
    445
    Thank You Posts

    Default Pretty boy

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Jackie and Gus: I've tried to redo the image making the corrections you two have suggested. Is this better?

  5. #5
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    8,458
    Threads
    682
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Think you could back off on the whites a little Wendell. Think they might look a little muddy?? Did you use the burning tool. Don't know if you have linear burn or not, you could try that. The framing looks really nice on your repost.

  6. #6
    Alfred Forns
    Guest

    Default

    Hi Wendell how were you trying to fix the whites? Need to do during the conversion thats what Jackie is talking about !!!

    Those ducks are difficult to expose and need just about perfect light !!!

  7. #7
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Costa Mesa, CA
    Posts
    1,289
    Threads
    445
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Well, Jackie, i tried to do it with Tone Curve in Lightroom, but I can see that i failed. I've now tried your "burn" suggestion, in PS, and got a much better result. Thanks for your followup . . . I think I'm trying to oversimplify my work by doing all my corrections in Lightroom, and some images can use more attention in Elements or PS.

  8. #8
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Costa Mesa, CA
    Posts
    1,289
    Threads
    445
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Alfred, please explain "need to do during the conversion."

  9. #9
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    8,458
    Threads
    682
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    You shoot in RAW Wendell? That is when you have the most flexibility to fix an image without your changes being destructive and changing the actual pixels ( I think) I shoot in RAW, then convert to TIFFS for print, and finally jpegs here for posting. Just bought a TERRABYTE of memory because some of the files can become so large if you are saving all the layers.

  10. #10
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Costa Mesa, CA
    Posts
    1,289
    Threads
    445
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Yes, Jackie, I do shoot in RAW. I use the same process you say you do. Is that what is meant by "need to do during the conversion"?

  11. #11
    Lance Peters
    Guest

    Default

    Hi Wendell - all great advice above and agre with it all - yes you should make your changes to the RAW file before you save it as a JPG. I don't know that you are going to have the latitude to improve it much - we have tons of black and white birds over here and soft light really is a nessecity.
    looking forward to more :)

  12. #12
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Toronto, Canada
    Posts
    8,458
    Threads
    682
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Yes Wendell, that is when you should do most of your major changes, during RAW. Also I find if you have a very good pic to start with ( in camera) you almost have to do nothing or very little in camera raw. It saves you a whole pile of work.

  13. #13
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Costa Mesa, CA
    Posts
    1,289
    Threads
    445
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Lance and Jackie, thanks for your clarification (funny how the shorthand of otherwise clear terminology about procedure is puzzling for a neophyte, isn't it) . . . and, yes, I am using the same "process routine" that you are, Jackie. So, I simply must try to do a better job while I still have the image in a RAW state.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics