Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: California Quail (male)

  1. #1
    Mark Schmitt
    Guest

    Default California Quail (male)

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Keeping a lot of feed in the yard for these. Better numbers of them this year.

    Self critique. A little better head turn for eye contact; could be a little better detail in black areas; colours are good but there could be a little more dynamic in the contrast.

    EXIF
    Camera: Canon 30D
    Lense: Canon EF 500 IS L @ f 4.0
    Metering: partial
    Mode: all manual
    Exposure: 1/640 @ f 6.3: fill flash 1/4 power, better beamer extender
    ISO: 400
    White bal.: custom - 5450

  2. #2
    Axel Hildebrandt
    Guest

    Default

    I like the angle, BG and unusual setting and only wish for a bit more eye contact. You could try to raise the contrast a bit and maybe some more sharpening, too.

  3. #3
    Julie Kenward
    Guest

    Default

    Mark, I agree with Axel's comments. I also find the hot spots on the top of the rocks to be a little distracting. You might use the clone tool or levels to bring those down a bit so they aren't so hot.

    It's too bad you didn't get a better head angle...there's so much texture and pattern going on between the bird and the rocks...this is really an interesting image.

  4. #4
    Co-Founder James Shadle's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2007
    Location
    Valrico, Fl
    Posts
    5,108
    Threads
    1,419
    Thank You Posts
    Blog Entries
    11

    Default

    Mark,
    Rather than cloning the hot spots, try burning them in. Using the dodge and burn tool is a chemical dark room technique that I personally prefer.
    This is a beautiful bird! I too feel eye contact between subject and viewer would make this an even stronger image.

  5. #5
    Publisher Arthur Morris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Indian Lake Estates, FL
    Posts
    32,506
    Threads
    1,433
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    All good comments above. I only wish that he were on the higher prettier rock. I kinda like the head position but am not a fan of sidelight (with the hot strip of breast...)
    BIRDS AS ART Blog: great info and lessons, lots of images with our legendary BAA educational Captions; we will not sell you junk. 30+ years of long lens experience/e-mail with gear questions.

    BIRDS AS ART Online Store: we will not sell you junk. 35 years of long lens experience. Please e-mail with gear questions.

    Check out the new SONY e-Guide and videos that I did with Patrick Sparkman here. Ten percent discount for BPN members,

    E-mail me at samandmayasgrandpa@att.net.










  6. #6
    BPN Member Tony Whitehead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    3,972
    Threads
    142
    Thank You Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    Agree with the above critiques - regarding sharpening I think a little more may be good but not on the pale spots on the nape which already look a little oversharpened to my eye.
    Tony Whitehead
    Visit my blog at WildLight Photography for latest news and images.

  7. #7
    Super Moderator Daniel Cadieux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    26,273
    Threads
    3,977
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I'm also a fan of the burn/dodge tools...would work perfectly here for those "hot" spots. The rest your your self-critique are bang on. Just a question: When you critique yourself do you go back and revisit your images to tweak them (I'm talking about the post-processing of course - not the head turn)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics