Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Master Fisherman

  1. #1
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Miami Beach, FL
    Posts
    555
    Threads
    193
    Thank You Posts

    Default Master Fisherman

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Mark III, 400mm f/4 DO, ISO 500, f5.0, 1/3200, slightly underexposed but salvagable.

  2. #2
    Publisher Arthur Morris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Indian Lake Estates, FL
    Posts
    32,506
    Threads
    1,433
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Spectacular image, head angle, and fish. Excessive lightening (most likely with Shadow Highlight) is obvious and greatly reduces iamge quality. Try processing it a bit darker and the results might be spectacular. Alwas best to get the EXP right in the field...

    Evaulative metering at zero most likely would have been fine with most MIII bodies. What mode were you in? What EXP compensation?
    BIRDS AS ART Blog: great info and lessons, lots of images with our legendary BAA educational Captions; we will not sell you junk. 30+ years of long lens experience/e-mail with gear questions.

    BIRDS AS ART Online Store: we will not sell you junk. 35 years of long lens experience. Please e-mail with gear questions.

    Check out the new SONY e-Guide and videos that I did with Patrick Sparkman here. Ten percent discount for BPN members,

    E-mail me at samandmayasgrandpa@att.net.










  3. #3
    Axel Hildebrandt
    Guest

    Default

    Very cool capture, the open mouth of the fish makes this one for me. Adding to Artie's comments, I would sharpen bird and fish some more.

  4. #4
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Miami Beach, FL
    Posts
    555
    Threads
    193
    Thank You Posts

    Default repost from a different RAW

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Actually it wasn't underexposed at all., Artie. I was shooting manual. This is 4 frames after the first post, and I think it looks a little better. It is about a 50% crop which may have degraded the image a little.

  5. #5
    Julie Kenward
    Guest

    Default

    Incredible image, Susan! I like the second one even better than the first. The bird and the fish are great but I really love that neck being reflected in the water. Very cool!

  6. #6
    Publisher Arthur Morris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Indian Lake Estates, FL
    Posts
    32,506
    Threads
    1,433
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by susanschermer View Post
    Actually it wasn't underexposed at all., Artie.
    Susan, You wrote this in your original post: "...slightly underexposed but salvagable."

    Which is it? :) :) :)
    BIRDS AS ART Blog: great info and lessons, lots of images with our legendary BAA educational Captions; we will not sell you junk. 30+ years of long lens experience/e-mail with gear questions.

    BIRDS AS ART Online Store: we will not sell you junk. 35 years of long lens experience. Please e-mail with gear questions.

    Check out the new SONY e-Guide and videos that I did with Patrick Sparkman here. Ten percent discount for BPN members,

    E-mail me at samandmayasgrandpa@att.net.










  7. #7
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Miami Beach, FL
    Posts
    555
    Threads
    193
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Sorry,I made an error in my first post. :p

  8. #8
    DanielleCox
    Guest

    Default

    Plus: I like the water drops on the first image.
    Minus: I find myself looking at the eyes and they seem off, I like them better in the second image

    Overall, a neat image!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics