Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Sandhill Crane -'Tis the season for Bosque

  1. #1
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Southeast Florida
    Posts
    80
    Threads
    44
    Thank You Posts

    Default Sandhill Crane -'Tis the season for Bosque

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Subject: Sandhill Crane in Flight
    Location: Bosque del Apache, San Antonio, NM

    Camera: D300
    Lens: 18-200mm @200mm

    ISO 640 1/1000 @ f5.6

  2. #2
    Publisher Arthur Morris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Indian Lake Estates, FL
    Posts
    32,506
    Threads
    1,433
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Nice light and wing position OK. Sharp. Good EXP. But, the bird is too high in the sky for you to be able to create an intimate image. I advise folks never to raise the lens more than about 20 degrees above the horizon (unless the bird is right over your head). Here you have done everything right yet the image is not at all special to me.
    BIRDS AS ART Blog: great info and lessons, lots of images with our legendary BAA educational Captions; we will not sell you junk. 30+ years of long lens experience/e-mail with gear questions.

    BIRDS AS ART Online Store: we will not sell you junk. 35 years of long lens experience. Please e-mail with gear questions.

    Check out the new SONY e-Guide and videos that I did with Patrick Sparkman here. Ten percent discount for BPN members,

    E-mail me at samandmayasgrandpa@att.net.










  3. #3
    Super Moderator Daniel Cadieux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    26,266
    Threads
    3,976
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    The techs look great, but the composition is very centered for an inflight type image. Try cropping top and right and see if you like it better. Did you do something to the sky...I see an odd blue spot where the wing meets the neeck??

  4. #4
    BPN Member Tony Whitehead's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    3,972
    Threads
    142
    Thank You Posts
    Blog Entries
    3

    Default

    You've done well with lens not usually considered standard for this type of photography. I agree with Artie's advice on lens inclination and with this lens that gives you a very narrow range to work with as it's reach isn't very long. Light is nice and eye contact good. Agree with Dan that there is something funky happening along the leading edge of the far wing. I think his crop suggestion is good as it will decentre the bird.
    Tony Whitehead
    Visit my blog at WildLight Photography for latest news and images.

  5. #5
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Southeast Florida
    Posts
    80
    Threads
    44
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks for feedback. Not sure what's going on with sky. Interesting thoughts about angle (makes sense) that I had not considered. Just happened to have short lens handy when crane came close by.

    Best

  6. #6
    Publisher Arthur Morris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Indian Lake Estates, FL
    Posts
    32,506
    Threads
    1,433
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Filemon, YAW. Thanks to being open to my point of view on the matter.

    ps: I missed that funky blue area... Just shows that when I say that I do not have a good eye for detail I am not making it up...
    BIRDS AS ART Blog: great info and lessons, lots of images with our legendary BAA educational Captions; we will not sell you junk. 30+ years of long lens experience/e-mail with gear questions.

    BIRDS AS ART Online Store: we will not sell you junk. 35 years of long lens experience. Please e-mail with gear questions.

    Check out the new SONY e-Guide and videos that I did with Patrick Sparkman here. Ten percent discount for BPN members,

    E-mail me at samandmayasgrandpa@att.net.










  7. #7
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Leiden, The Netherlands
    Posts
    1,020
    Threads
    148
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    As a response to Artie's comment about the bird being to high in the sky I would like to raise a question not as critique but more from discussion point of view. Robert O' Toole just posted a sandhill crane shot where the crane was also relatively high in the sky. Why is that image considered intimate and this one not? Is it the pose, the open beak? Would be interesting to know what other people think.

    Cheers,

    Krijn

  8. #8
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Leiden, The Netherlands
    Posts
    1,020
    Threads
    148
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Regarding the photo I would probably crop a little of the right and a smidge of the top. Like the light, eye contact and wing position. Nice shot

  9. #9
    Publisher Arthur Morris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Indian Lake Estates, FL
    Posts
    32,506
    Threads
    1,433
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Krijn Trimbos View Post
    As a response to Artie's comment about the bird being to high in the sky I would like to raise a question not as critique but more from discussion point of view. Robert O' Toole just posted a sandhill crane shot where the crane was also relatively high in the sky. Why is that image considered intimate and this one not? Is it the pose, the open beak? Would be interesting to know what other people think.
    Cheers, Krijn
    Hi Krijn, Are you referring to Robert's U-Turn image here: http://www.birdphotographers.net/for...ad.php?t=25909
    BIRDS AS ART Blog: great info and lessons, lots of images with our legendary BAA educational Captions; we will not sell you junk. 30+ years of long lens experience/e-mail with gear questions.

    BIRDS AS ART Online Store: we will not sell you junk. 35 years of long lens experience. Please e-mail with gear questions.

    Check out the new SONY e-Guide and videos that I did with Patrick Sparkman here. Ten percent discount for BPN members,

    E-mail me at samandmayasgrandpa@att.net.










  10. #10
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Leiden, The Netherlands
    Posts
    1,020
    Threads
    148
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Artie,

    Yes that was the one I was referring to. I mean the angle of photography seems to be sort of the same, of course the pose is a lot different and the open beak is very cool as well. I was just wondering if that compensated for the steeper angle in your opinion or what your thoughts about these things were.

    Thanks in advance,

    Krijn

  11. #11
    Publisher Arthur Morris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Indian Lake Estates, FL
    Posts
    32,506
    Threads
    1,433
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Krijn, Here is what I wrote above: "But, the bird is too high in the sky for you to be able to create an intimate image. I advise folks never to raise the lens more than about 20 degrees above the horizon (unless the bird is right over your head)."

    With Robert's image, the bird is almost "right overhead"; it was headed there, so the photographers, and wheeled. Robert captured the perfect pose. I should have qualified my original statement by adding "when they are creating images with the bird flying from side to side. No favoritism involved. The images are vastly different...
    BIRDS AS ART Blog: great info and lessons, lots of images with our legendary BAA educational Captions; we will not sell you junk. 30+ years of long lens experience/e-mail with gear questions.

    BIRDS AS ART Online Store: we will not sell you junk. 35 years of long lens experience. Please e-mail with gear questions.

    Check out the new SONY e-Guide and videos that I did with Patrick Sparkman here. Ten percent discount for BPN members,

    E-mail me at samandmayasgrandpa@att.net.










Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics