Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: New Lens

  1. #1
    Mike Moats
    Guest

    Default New Lens

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    In my workshops I teach that you don't have to buy the top of the line equipment (cameras, lenses, tripod, heads,etc.)and mortgage your house to make good macro images. I always recommend for macro that if you can afford it, go with a macro lens in the longer focal lengths (150 or up). In the last few workshops, some of my students were using a Sigma APO DG 70-300 zoom macro lens. Viewing their images in photoshop I was quite impress with what I saw, which was very good sharpness. It has a macro ratio of 1 to 2 instead of the true macro lens which offer a 1 to 1 ratio, but hey its pretty close and none of the students with this lens were having any problems shooting the subjects in the workshops. I went home and checked out the price of this lens and was shocked that it only cost $149.00:eek:. I decide I had to buy one and try it for myself. I compared the Sigma 70-300 against my Sigma 180 macro and will admit that it wasn't as sharp as the 180 but it was pretty darn good for $149.00. The macro range on this lens only works in the 200mm to 300mm range which is what I wanted for. I went out yesterday and shot a ton of different subjects and got very good results. I had to do a tad more sharpening than I do with the 180, but it worked out fine. In the past at my introduction to macro workshops many of the new comers that were there to learn about what equipment was needed for macro were not in a position to buy a lens only for macro and I would let them know that they could still shoot macro with their regular lens and add extension tubes to shoot in closer. The tubes on the low cost end run about $159.00 for a set of three and are a hassle to deal with adding and subtracting as you move in and out from the subject. Now I can recommend a low cost option for less than a set of tubes and less the hassle of working with the tubes. This was one of the images I shot and you can see it looks really nice coming out of a $149.00 lens. I varied shots with standing subjects with blurred BG and it also worked well. This is my usual leaf type image (Leaves are encased in ice) and since I've been posting some ice abstracts I'll show you some done with the 70-300.

    Fuji S5, Sigma 70-300 macro, Tripod, Natural light, f/32
    Last edited by Mike Moats; 12-12-2008 at 01:05 PM.

  2. #2
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    23,119
    Threads
    1,523
    Thank You Posts
    Blog Entries
    55

    Default

    Mike, I like this abstract alot-I like how the main vein is on a diagonal and the ice is only on part of the leaf so detail can be seen. The lens is something to consider-thanks

  3. #3
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Solothurn-Switzerland
    Posts
    1,658
    Threads
    127
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Beautiful image Mike. No wonder the experts say that the equipment does not really matter !
    Mike, how close is the focusing distance from the subject ?

  4. #4
    BPN Member Don Lacy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    SE Florida
    Posts
    3,566
    Threads
    348
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Mike, really interesting image with the patterns and layers.
    Don Lacy
    You don't take a photograph, you make it - Ansel Adams
    There are no rules for good photographs, there are only good photographs - Ansel Adams
    http://www.witnessnature.net/
    https://500px.com/lacy

  5. #5
    Julie Kenward
    Guest

    Default

    That's funny that you mentioned that lens because my local camera guy was pushing that one on me the last time I was in to see him! I read some good reviews on it but, as you said, it's not quite as sharp as one of the higher priced name brand lenses (duh). It's good to see you're impressed with it...gives me another reference point for when I go to buy my next lens.

  6. #6
    Mike Moats
    Guest

    Default

    Hey Kaushik, I was about five feet away on this shot.

    Hey Jules, its a good lens for someone wanting to test the waters with macro before investing in the higher priced lens.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics