Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: A fisherman in morning light.

  1. #1
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Sweden, Småland, Vimmerby
    Posts
    7
    Threads
    3
    Thank You Posts

    Default A fisherman in morning light.

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Intro:
    This is a Kingfisher (Alcedo atthis/Kungsfiskare) at close up. I even had to remove the extender as it would not otherwise have fitted in the frame... ;o) This photo is from a distance of approximately 3 meters from a small hide.

    It was amazing to get such a good look and I saw a very peculiar behaviour. When he caught a small fish he smacked it very hard to the pole to kill it before he swallowed it. I guess it it is a bit unpleasant to have a struggling fish down your throat....

    I also think that the little azure blue tail is extremely cute! I have never seen it this way before.

    A close friend of mine suggested that this might be a young kingfisher as the plumage are in such good condition and that the feathers on the breast are so fluffy.

    Geographic info:
    This from river Rönne å to the northwest of of the lake Ringsjön in the most southern part of Sweden called Skåne.

    Technical information:
    Canon 300/f4 lens on a Canon 40D body, in rawformat and used Adobe Lightroom for some adjustments before the edit in Photoshop CS3.

    Exp=1/200, f=5,6 ISO=400

    Just crop, white balance and a bit hue
    Noise reduction with Noiseware professional
    Sharpening with Photokit capture sharpener
    Last edited by falke; 01-18-2008 at 01:27 PM.

  2. #2
    Forum Participant Manos Papadomanolakis's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Crete Greece
    Posts
    3,408
    Threads
    179
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I really like the action!
    My only nit the BG is little busy

  3. #3
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Pretoria, South AFrica
    Posts
    275
    Threads
    18
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Yep, subject very nicely placed and sharp. The background a little busy with some distracting highlights.

  4. #4
    Fabs Forns
    Guest

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Other than the busy background, it's a great image.
    I used a vignette blur filter and cloned the highlights out with a very low opacity clone stamp.

    Hope you like it! Tried to leave enough detail in the bg to make it look real.

  5. #5
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Sweden, Småland, Vimmerby
    Posts
    7
    Threads
    3
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thank you so much for your time, Fabs! I am a little divided here and maybe you can help me out..... ;o)
    I can't help thinking that your edit makes the photo stronger as it makes the Kingfisher stand out even further

    However despite this, am I not sure that this is the right way to go. In Sweden we have a debate among birders about digital manipulation of bird photographs. I know that you have only changed the BG but even so. Is this kind of digital editing OK here on this site and regarded as OK even by ornithologists in the USA. As a biologist I like to see the habitat, the BG and the things around... but I think that on quite a few photographs the birds seems almost stuffed and put on a stand in a museum... as there is no environment what so ever. I think that it should not be too perfect... then it becomes unnatural and in some way artificial.
    Last edited by falke; 01-18-2008 at 02:24 PM.

  6. #6
    Alfred Forns
    Guest

    Default

    I like the re post !!!! Just perfect !!!!!

    Falke I understand your concerns The image should be enhance to your ethics and no more I don't think there is clear guideline on what to do Basically is psersonal choice I have no problem with the manipulation as long as is disclosed and within limits

    I'm sure any time there is a suggestion it is based on the person (making suggestion) ethics We all should be comfortble with what we are doing

    One way or the other it is a fine image in every way !!!!! Big Congrats !!!!

  7. #7
    Judy Lynn Malloch
    Guest

    Default

    Wonderful image Falke with such excllent detail and lighting and the fish in the beak is awesome. I do like the repost as I think very little was taken away only enough to remove a couple of spots that was drawing the eye away from the image. Wonderful capture !!

  8. #8
    Fabs Forns
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by falke View Post
    Thank you so much for your time, Fabs! I am a little divided here and maybe you can help me out..... ;o)
    I can't help thinking that your edit makes the photo stronger as it makes the Kingfisher stand out even further

    However despite this, am I not sure that this is the right way to go. In Sweden we have a debate among birders about digital manipulation of bird photographs. I know that you have only changed the BG but even so. Is this kind of digital editing OK here on this site and regarded as OK even by ornithologists in the USA. As a biologist I like to see the habitat, the BG and the things around... but I think that on quite a few photographs the birds seems almost stuffed and put on a stand in a museum... as there is no environment what so ever. I think that it should not be too perfect... then it becomes unnatural and in some way artificial.

    No problem, Falke.
    I understand and respect you point and there's always a debate going here on how much to go. Up to personal ethics and preferences :)
    Having said that, habitat and be attractive and distracting, and if we are looking at including the environment and not editing the image, we need to be extra careful when we frame in camera, to make as pleasing and authentic as possible.
    Tha would be the best of both worlds :)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics