Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Prospect Harbor Maine

  1. #1
    Michael Pancier
    Guest

    Default Prospect Harbor Maine

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Five image stitch using the new stitch action in Photoshop CS 4. Major improvement.

    5d + 70-200 2.8L at 70mm
    f/13
    1/30
    manual
    RRS Pano head

  2. #2
    Fabs Forns
    Guest

    Default

    I think you really made good use of this trip, gorgeous light and well executed.

  3. #3
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    New Jersey
    Posts
    6,829
    Threads
    569
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Beautiful light!! I think you should crop out the water tank otherwise a pretty image

  4. #4
    Robert Amoruso
    Guest

    Default

    Nice work Michael. Now I want to get home and try out the new CS4 stitching.

  5. #5
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Cary, North Carolina
    Posts
    789
    Threads
    64
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Michael,
    Great light. I especially like the foreground rocks. I do feel that the scene is a bit too wide without adequate height to make the image feel like it can be "taken in" by the eyes. (I'm sure you've read comments from me before about my "golden mean" of 3:8 proportions for panos). It is a matter of personal taste. However, I do wonder if a position more to the right, to eliminate some of the vastness of the middle "third" of open water, might make it stronger compositionally, while also tightening the aspect ratio?

  6. #6
    Robert Amoruso
    Guest

    Default

    David,

    I have seen you mention a personal preference for height to width before but this is the first time I recall seeing the actual dimensions for 3:8. Perhaps I missed this. Why not 1:2.5 which has a numerically close h/w ratio of 0.375 vs. 0.40? I have seen the 1:2.5 ratio recommended and use that as my personal guide. Thanks.

  7. #7
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Parsonsfield, Maine
    Posts
    2,183
    Threads
    199
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Michael, David and Robert,

    I do not understand the ratio's, but one thing for sure, I think it is a good thing to try to understand in order to make the most of our images. Here. I think the better image might be more height, less on the far right to remove the brush or perhaps make it more noticeable in the frame. I like the idea David has of compressing the water just a bit, not too much in order not to lose the effect of far away but near. Just my two cents worth.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics