Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Red Lily and a Monarch

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Weimar, TX
    Posts
    934
    Threads
    274
    Thank You Posts

    Default Red Lily and a Monarch

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    The butterfly was really digging deep in a patch of red lilies that came up in my yard. Some people gripe when I post macro images from a 600mm lens used with macro tubes. If it's not acceptable here that's cool. Just move it or delete it. I use my 600mm lens with tubes a lot and I personally consider it a tool for macro photography. Especially when the subject won't let you get close (for some reason the butterflies that frequent these lilies leave when I try to get within 180mm macro lens range).

    EOS 1DsMKIII
    600mm f4L IS with a total of 37mm of Canon tubes

    1/40 second
    f5.6
    ISO 400

  2. #2
    Julie Kenward
    Guest

    Default

    You are perfectly fine to post those types of images here, Michael. Macro is not the lens you use but the magnification you get and this is nicely done. I think you did a very nice job on the image overall - good DOF and you have a lovely BG color against the red flowers. I do wonder if the butterfly didn't get a bit washed out in the process? Perhaps selecting him and deepening the mid/dark tones a bit?

  3. #3
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Weimar, TX
    Posts
    934
    Threads
    274
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks Julie!

    In the case of the butterfly, I think that he / she is a senior citizen. While I was shooting I noticed that it was not as "contrasty" as they usually are. Maybe all that flapping around "slung" it's color off :D But... I think your idea would help the image.

  4. #4
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    The Netherlands
    Posts
    1,991
    Threads
    192
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hey Michael, I like your image. The flowers provide an excelent canvas for the butterfly. I wish it was a bit larger in the frame, I find myself a bit too distracted by those beautifully detailed flowers. Regarding your choice of lenses and tubes: IMO this is exactly the reason why extension tubes were invented! Many of the "macro"images I shoot were simply shot at 500 mm for the same reason! A considerable working distance is a good thing with jumpy subjects. By the way, based on the wing markings and the extensions on the lower wings, I don't think that this butterfly is a Monarch. I'm not an expert on US species, but by the looks of it, it belongs to the Papilionidae family.
    - Jerry -
    Last edited by Jerry van Dijk; 10-22-2008 at 01:48 PM. Reason: Forgot to add comment about butterfly species

  5. #5
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    St. Charles, Missouri
    Posts
    362
    Threads
    28
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    For comparison, here's a Monarch. http://www.birdphotographers.net/for...ad.php?t=22452

    Your's is definitely a swallowtail, I think probably a spicebush swallowtail, but it's pretty faded (they constantly lose wing scales during their brief adult lives).

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics