Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Dragonfly Amidst Star Thistle

  1. #1
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Willits, California
    Posts
    616
    Threads
    242
    Thank You Posts

    Default Dragonfly Amidst Star Thistle

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Early in the morning is a great time to find dragonflies like this one. They are still too cold to fly and the morning light is soft. My self critique is that it is a bit centered and the star thistle on the right pulls your eye from the subject. Also the spectral highlights on the wing are a little strong. It will be good for me to hear what others have to say.

    Canon 10D
    Promaster 100mm Macro
    Bogen 3021 Tripod w heavy duty 3055 ballhead
    ISO 100
    Manual mode
    f8 @ 1/60th sec.

    God's light to all,

    Chris

  2. #2
    Julie Kenward
    Guest

    Default

    I think despite all you said it is a really nice image. It does feel like it needs a little more room and I do wish that one flower were more to the side than directly OVER the wing. You did a great job on DOF though and I even like the highlights on the wings. Cool photo!

  3. #3
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    St. Charles, Missouri
    Posts
    362
    Threads
    28
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Chris,
    You've already identified the things that could have been a little better. The only one that bothers me is the bright flower at right. Apart from that, this is a very nice dragon image. The basic composition, straight on from above the dfly, wings essentially horizontal, centered left-right, is pretty classic. I see a lot of published (calendars, books, web) professional dfly images that use this composition. It can be a bit stronger if the dfly isn't quite centered vertically, but really to do that you have to back off a bit and leave the dfly a bit smaller in the frame; a matter of taste, and what you're trying to show. A little bit of diagonal to the wings can also be stronger, but ... taste.

    A question about the specular highlights: Were you using flash, or were these just from sunlight? Either way, a diffuser would soften them a bit, if you prefer an image without strong highlights. This is another thing I think is a matter of taste, and again, I see a lot of published pro dfly images with the same sort of specular highlights.

    Thinking a little more about the bright yellow flower, I tried a couple things in PS to see if I could make it less distracting, without removing it altogether. A simple duplicate layer set to multiply, and masked to affect only the FG flower and lighter areas of the BG didn't seem to work for me; it darkened those areas but also increased the saturation, which left them just as distracting. I think some direct tweaking of saturation and lightness (by channel) followed by selective weak burning actually reduces the distraction. [I reduced yellow sat & lightness by 7 & 10 respectively, and increased sat by 10 in the red, blue, & cyan channels.] What do you think?

    Chris

  4. #4
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Willits, California
    Posts
    616
    Threads
    242
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I appreciate the feedback. Julie I agree it needs a touch more room as I look at it. Chris on my old iMac monitor I can't even see a difference. So I need to take a look at it on a better computer. With regard to the light source I was using a gold metallic reflector to fill in the shadows so it wouldn't appear as a silhouette.
    Thanks for your input and God bless,

    Chris

  5. #5
    Mike Moats
    Guest

    Default

    Hey Chris, Nice sharp details on the D-fly, and a tad to much details in the BG for my taste. The D-fly is on a nice flat plane and with the front of your lens at the same plane you may have been able to maintain the details and have a little less BG by shooting at f.5.6 instead of the f/8

  6. #6
    Robert O'Toole
    Guest

    Default

    Chris,

    Looks like a Male Window Skimmer in very good shape!

    I agree with Mike's recommendations about the BG.

    Robert

  7. #7
    Robert O'Toole
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Chris Starbuck View Post
    Chris,
    You've already identified the things that could have been a little better. The only one that bothers me is the bright flower at right. Apart from that, this is a very nice dragon image. The basic composition, straight on from above the dfly, wings essentially horizontal, centered left-right, is pretty classic. I see a lot of published (calendars, books, web) professional dfly images that use this composition. It can be a bit stronger if the dfly isn't quite centered vertically, but really to do that you have to back off a bit and leave the dfly a bit smaller in the frame; a matter of taste, and what you're trying to show. A little bit of diagonal to the wings can also be stronger, but ... taste.

    A question about the specular highlights: Were you using flash, or were these just from sunlight? Either way, a diffuser would soften them a bit, if you prefer an image without strong highlights. This is another thing I think is a matter of taste, and again, I see a lot of published pro dfly images with the same sort of specular highlights.

    Thinking a little more about the bright yellow flower, I tried a couple things in PS to see if I could make it less distracting, without removing it altogether. A simple duplicate layer set to multiply, and masked to affect only the FG flower and lighter areas of the BG didn't seem to work for me; it darkened those areas but also increased the saturation, which left them just as distracting. I think some direct tweaking of saturation and lightness (by channel) followed by selective weak burning actually reduces the distraction. [I reduced yellow sat & lightness by 7 & 10 respectively, and increased sat by 10 in the red, blue, & cyan channels.] What do you think?

    Chris
    Wow that is a lot of work Chris. One side effect to your darkening is increased noise creating more problems.

    I think the only viable solution if so inclined would be to just remove the flower head. Would take a few minutes and would not show any traces or side effects.

    Robert

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics