Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Crazy Woman Creek

  1. #1
    Mac Wheeler McDougal Jr.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Peoria, IL
    Posts
    538
    Threads
    222
    Thank You Posts

    Default Crazy Woman Creek

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    This is the second image from my trip to Wyoming. I woulkd like to pose the question: Is there too much detail along the creek. I attempted to blur the water in the stream with the camera, but it was fairly bright day and I did not have a tripod or a neutral density filter. It was hand held and you can see, below, the speed I used. I used a little motion blur in PS, but that was all. I am really interested in your opinions.

    2008:09:27 128:07
    28-70mm @ 70mm
    70mm (in 35mm film)
    1/640 sec, f/2.8
    Mode: Av
    Metering: Multi-segment
    ISO: 200
    AF mode: AF-C
    White balance: AUTO
    Flash: Off
    File size: 16.4MB
    Image size: 3036 x 2010
    Saturation: Normal
    Sharpness: Normal
    Contrast: Normal

  2. #2
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    St. Louis, Missouri, USA
    Posts
    540
    Threads
    70
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Wheeler,

    You picked an interesting subject, getting a nice curve in the creek, well-lined by colorful vegetation.

    For improvment of the image, I agree with your self-assessment regarding the water and lack of blur, that a longer exposure would help. It would make the water look like it's flowing, rather than static. Your metadata says you shot at f/2.8, which is very wide -- possibly fully wide open on your lens. Stopping down toward the smaller apertures (higher number), like f/22, would give you a slower shutter speed as well as more depth of field (1/640 @ f/2.8 = 1/0 @ f/22). I'd also suggest using a polarizer to cut some glare on the water -- the amount of reduction is up to you. Lastly I think you should rotate the image counterclockwise a bit. It has the feeling of being on a slant.

    Keep on shooting & posting!

  3. #3
    Mac Wheeler McDougal Jr.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Peoria, IL
    Posts
    538
    Threads
    222
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Bruce- My apologies about this posting. Above you will find the image I intended to post and the shooting data that goes with it. Please judge this image instead of the first.

    Mac

    2008:09:27 1261
    28-70mm @ 70mm
    70mm (in 35mm film)
    1/10 sec, f/22
    Mode: Av
    Metering: Multi-segment
    ISO: 200
    White balance: Auto
    Flash: Off
    File size: 76.3MB
    Image size: 4256 x 2832
    Color space: sRGB
    Saturation: Normal
    Sharpness: Normal
    Contrast: Normal
    Color profile: sRGB

  4. #4
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    St. Charles, Missouri
    Posts
    362
    Threads
    28
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Mac,
    Definitely better (and I think really good) all around. I like the framing better -- including that interesting little rill at the lower right while excluding some of the less interesting trees at the top is a definite improvement. The detail & sharpness look great -- you must be a human tripod to have achieved that handheld at 1/10 sec! That SS is slow enough to show some nice flow in the water, though you could have gone 1 stop slower by switching to ISO 100 (if your camera supports it). I agree with Bruce that a polarizer might have improved the image a bit by removing some of the glare from foliage and water. I generally don't want to remove all the water reflections -- that can make the water surface disappear -- so I tend to adjust for max polarization and then back off until the water is nicely defined (whatever I think that means at the time).

    Chris

  5. #5
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    St. Louis, Missouri, USA
    Posts
    540
    Threads
    70
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Mac (sorry, didn't see you use the nickname with my first response!),

    I really like this second image. I'm glad you took this one and had it to post. The DOF and SS are much better here, and the bit of whitish water at the bottom adds more interest. You know about the polarizer possibility already. The only other thing I'd suggest here is to try to even the lighting between the bushes on the left, which are darker, and those on the right (lighter).

    Nice find!

  6. #6
    Mac Wheeler McDougal Jr.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Peoria, IL
    Posts
    538
    Threads
    222
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Chris and Bruce- Thank you so very much for your thoughts concerning this posting. I am especially glad that I had the second exposure and that it was, in my opinion and also your s, the much better of the two. Chris, I maybe should not have said that the camera was hand held as I was standing on a bridge and I used the railing as a support. I wish I was still out there so I could try a reshoot with the polarizer. Is there a way one could simulate the efect in PS? Thanks again for your opinions, it is helping to make me a competent photographer.

    Mac

  7. #7
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    St. Charles, Missouri
    Posts
    362
    Threads
    28
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Mac,
    I've heard or read people referring to trying to simulate a polarizing filter in PS, but hadn't ever seen a description of how to do it.

    However, I just Googled "simulate polarizing filter in photoshop", and the first hit is at
    http://photoshoptutorials.ws/photosh...ng-filter.html

    There are bunches of other hits too, and some of them might be even better, but this is the only one I've looked at so far.

    I haven't tried this, but the instructions look pretty detailed (if rather complicated), and the process looks to me like it's probably amenable to turning into a PS action. The examples given look pretty good. Unfortunately one of the situations in which he recommends not using this approach is when the image has a lot of red in it, which yours does. Try it and see. I need to try this out too, on some of my images taken when I left the polarizer in the car; it really looks interesting. I need to follow some of the other hits too.

    Chris

  8. #8
    Mac Wheeler McDougal Jr.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Peoria, IL
    Posts
    538
    Threads
    222
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Chris-
    Here is an example of how "your simulate polorizing filter in Photoshp" suggestion turned out with my Crazy Woman Creek image. I think it was quite good, what do you think? It certainly wasn't hard to do. Thanks again for your help.

    Mac

  9. #9
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    St. Charles, Missouri
    Posts
    362
    Threads
    28
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Mac,
    I agree, that looks pretty good! The colors are clearly more saturated, and the water actually looks like it has less sky reflection.
    Chris

  10. #10
    Julie Kenward
    Guest

    Default

    What a great progression of images, Mac! I think that's why I love this forum so much...you get all these great people to help you take your images one step further and that's just such a great thing! You did an excellent job of taking a good photo and making it much better by following some very helpful advice. I'd frame it! :D

  11. #11
    Roman Kurywczak
    Guest

    Default

    Hi Wheeler,
    I do like the 2nd version better. I don't want to give a speech on how important a tripod is for landscapes......but you get the idea. Nice re-work on the image also.

  12. #12
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Angels Camp, CA
    Posts
    213
    Threads
    55
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Just a beginner, but I would have like to have shot this with my 12X24mm on Portrait - 100 ISO - 81a circular polorizer. Maybe stitching two or three shots. Love to see the sky if possible. I like your rendition at the top, but with the circular polorizer used.

    Rob Miner

  13. #13
    Robert Amoruso
    Guest

    Default

    Not much more for me to add here on the PS techniques. I do like the comp Mac.

  14. #14
    Mac Wheeler McDougal Jr.'s Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Peoria, IL
    Posts
    538
    Threads
    222
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Robert, Roman, Rob, Jules, Chris, and Bruce- Thank you all for your input on this project. It ended up a much better image than when we started. This is really what makes this such a great web site. Again, thank you all.

    Mac

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics