Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Confused Heron ?

  1. #1
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    1,109
    Threads
    156
    Thank You Posts

    Default Confused Heron ?

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Not sure this Green Backed Heron is in his natural environment :), but in this case I'll say thank you sir and snap away. I applied a slight blur to backround and burned the bg to help the bird stand out a bit more. I sharpened the eye a bit more than the bird also. So please set me straight. am I going the right way? Should I crop off a bit on the right to make the eye closer to the intersecting 3rd, or would that make the frame too tight on the bird?

    Canon 40D
    100-40F/11
    1/250th sec

    Thanks to all for the support and patience on previous posts.

  2. #2
    Dave Phillips
    Guest

    Default

    nice green heron Dave....In have literally shot 1,000's of these and came to conclusion that
    bright overcast is absolutely best light.....light is a bit harsh here, but very workable.
    You could open up a good bit from f/11 and get a much smoother bg probably.

    On the rule of thirds....it's a good starting point but not a must IMO. You still need to give room for bird to look into.
    The image is now probably as tight as it can be. Your exposure looks very good, that little white strip on the adult breast is hard to keep detail in.....good job sir

  3. #3
    Gus Cobos
    Guest

    Default

    Hi Dave,
    I like your composition, image, and exposure. The background is very soft and pleasing to the eyes. You have a good head angle and eye contact. I like the details in the feathers. One recommendation would be to add just a tad of canvas on the bottom frame for the feet...good show...looking foward to your next creation...:cool:

  4. #4
    Lance Peters
    Guest

    Default

    Hi Dave - lovely detail - nice head angle and eye contact and BG iis great.

    Unusall perch :)

  5. #5
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,940
    Threads
    288
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dave Phillips View Post
    On the rule of thirds....it's a good starting point but not a must IMO.
    I tend to agree. A bit more room on the right would be better.

    As an aside, I'm reading two books which happen to be written by photogs from Germany. It seems like instead of rule of thirds, they use Golden ratios, harmonic dividing lines, etc.

  6. #6
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Cheltenham, Glos UK
    Posts
    2,754
    Threads
    206
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Call it what you will, the rule of thirds or the golden ratio, it all amounts to the same thing - your eye knows when things are 'right'. It is all about proportion.
    Regards,
    Nicki

  7. #7
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,940
    Threads
    288
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Nicki Gwynn Jones View Post
    Call it what you will, the rule of thirds or the golden ratio, it all amounts to the same thing - your eye knows when things are 'right'. It is all about proportion.
    Regards,
    Nicki
    Actually, rule of thirds and the golden ratio are technically not the same thing, although they serve us the same way.

  8. #8
    Oscar Zangroniz
    Guest

    Default

    Great details Dave. Background is very nice, bird is very sharp.
    Regards,

  9. #9
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Cheltenham, Glos UK
    Posts
    2,754
    Threads
    206
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Desmond Chan View Post
    Actually, rule of thirds and the golden ratio are technically not the same thing, although they serve us the same way.
    Desmond, what I said was that they amounted to the same thing, not that they were the same thing...;)
    Regards,
    Nicki

  10. #10
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    1,109
    Threads
    156
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I appreciate the comments and discussion on the rule of thirds. In the past I had always been told to place the main subject at an intersecting line. Since I've been here I hear quite a bit about eye placement. I might mention that on this particular day I was on a dock shooting a sunken, decaying oyster boat. My wife said she thought there was a bittern or something behind me and when I turned this fellow was there. I grabbed a few frames before he took off. I had reservations about posting the bird on a boat railing. I guess the moral remains to always be aware of all your surroundings.

  11. #11
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    1,881
    Threads
    192
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Very nice Heron, Dave! Somewhere I read that a photographer should remember to turnaround and look at the view behind them because sometimes that's where the best shot is, looks like it was true for you.

  12. #12
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    May 2008
    Posts
    2,940
    Threads
    288
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Dave Woeller View Post
    [snip] My wife said she thought there was a bittern or something behind me and when I turned this fellow was there. I grabbed a few frames before he took off. I had reservations about posting the bird on a boat railing. I guess the moral remains to always be aware of all your surroundings.
    It's still a good photograph of a heron though. I don't think you can have in every frame an award winning shot.

  13. #13
    Lifetime Member Doug Brown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Albuquerque, NM
    Posts
    11,879
    Threads
    917
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Excellent comments by the ETL Gang! I would only add that in the future, please limit your photos to 800 pixels on the long side.
    Upcoming Workshops: Bosque del Apache 2019, Ecuador 2020 (details coming soon)
    Website -
    Facebook - 500px

  14. #14
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Aug 2008
    Posts
    1,109
    Threads
    156
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Sorry bout the size (Brain Freeze?) :( Don't know how it happened. I'll be more careful in the future.

  15. #15
    Alfred Forns
    Guest

    Default

    Second Doug on the great comments !!!!

    The biggest change here would have been using a wider aperture I'm always more concern with the bg having detail You did well in PS but can still tell some work was done.

    Desmond regarding the rules of third or harmonic diving lines ....... The rule of thirds is just a starting point and suggestion but if you look at it will be in play most of the time. Harmonic lines is totally subjective and if you look at their images will mostly conform to the rule of thirds !!!! One powerful tool !!

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics