Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Is this considered wildlife?

  1. #1
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Tampa, Florida, United States
    Posts
    599
    Threads
    100
    Thank You Posts

    Default Is this considered wildlife?

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Well, I wasn't sure where to post this one.

    Wildlife? Macro? I was shooting the heliconias in the back yard (didn't get anything worth posting), and I saw this little guy on the fence, so I decided to take his portrait. The blurred heliconias made for an interesting background. I selectively cleaned up the white fence post in PS (dust and scratches), sharpened the lizard, and reduced noise in the BG....

    Nikon D80
    ISO 400
    70-300@ 300mm
    1/800 sec @ f/5.6
    Handheld (I think I hate my new tripod)

    Thanks for your comments and suggestions!

    Amy D.

  2. #2
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Tampa, Florida, United States
    Posts
    599
    Threads
    100
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Just for fun, I'm re-posting this after exporting it as sRGB. I am using a Mac, and the Safari browser, so I think that I do not see a difference between Adobe RGB, and sRGB. But a post on another forum reminded me that perhaps folks using IE see something different. Is there a difference in the two?

    Thanks.
    Amy D.

  3. #3
    Oscar Zangroniz
    Guest

    Default

    Of course it's wildlife, like the re post better. I see more contrast on this one.
    Regards,

  4. #4
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Boynton Beach, Florida
    Posts
    7,726
    Threads
    640
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    yes it is wildlife!! the second one definitely has a different color to it. looks more saturated!! and it feels a little better too!! if you had a view of the entire anole, would have been better to include it. he needs his tail!!:D

  5. #5
    Alfred Forns
    Guest

    Default

    Amy there are very close but the re post does have more contras in my monitor also

    That lizard would look great with a better perch The light color is not doing well with the great bg Crop wise they are tough to frame but clipping the rear leg is not good ... might get you ........ :D

    Oscar... what do you mean this is wildlife :eek::)

    Had to edit .... Harold is going with wildlife also :o ... they must have some personal knowledge on that little guy :cool:

  6. #6
    Nonda Surratt
    Guest

    Default

    Yep more contrast in the repost!

    Alfred covered everything

  7. #7
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Tampa, Florida, United States
    Posts
    599
    Threads
    100
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Alfred Forns View Post
    Oscar... what do you mean this is wildlife :eek::)
    Well, I think Harold's lizard is wildlife. Mine's a lizard on my backyard fence.... ;)

    I kind of liked the connection of his coming into the background from the angle he was perched. I thought about doing something completely "different" to replace the white fence post in PS, but changed my mind.

    Thanks for the comments.

    Amy

  8. #8
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Cheltenham, Glos UK
    Posts
    2,754
    Threads
    206
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Amy, another vote for wildlife - I see more contrast too. I must admit I'm not overly keen on the white post.
    Regards,
    Nicki

  9. #9
    Tell Dickinson
    Guest

    Default

    Hi Amy, both look the same to me, I assume that is because I am using Firefox 3 with Colour Management turned on just like your Safari web browser. I think people with Internet Explorer will see a difference because I do not think that is 'Colour Aware' and just displays everything in sRGB.

    Tell

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics