
Originally Posted by
WIlliam Maroldo
Authur: I was thinking the same thing about the bird in front. As a matter of fact I was wondering all day about why it wasn't mentioned. There is an elephant in the room and nobody mentions it! I agree that ignoring major defects will not help the photographer to improve his skill, and sometimes I think, although they might say that they welcome criticism, and even may think this, they may not really. Personally I take tens of thousands of bird images, and if one were to get trashed, big deal. There's plenty more where that came from. However, some people have invested thousands of dollars in equipment, spent time and money to get opportunities to take bird photos, and now someone is telling them there are big problems with his images? I think that sometimes the criticism is taken personally, and the ultimate goal of becoming a better photographer is overshadowed. Maybe not to a great extent, but it might influence attitudes toward the one doing the criticism. I really think this forum is wonderful, but often think that the members are not being critical enough. Criticism is not a bad thing!I
That being said, I really appreciate what Arthur has said about the image, and its flaws. There are other members (like Alfred) that have no problem pointing out major flaws, and positive aspects as well. Praise is good, and an image may be excellent and technically flawless, but a string of positive comments, devoid of any actual substance like exactly why the image is excellent, is worthless in my book.
Back to Oscars image. The composition is excellent. The strong triangular shape created by the element's positions makes the image dynamic. The position of the rear bird, with open mouth, looking up, is wonderful. The bird in front, being out of focus, is an image killer. ~onlybill