Results 1 to 19 of 19

Thread: Cliff Swallow (major posting problem, help needed)

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    San Mateo, CA
    Posts
    3,643
    Threads
    398
    Thank You Posts

    Default Cliff Swallow (major posting problem, help needed)

    This is the first photo I edited in my new iMac (and using the most up-to-date version of LR), and I'm having a major posting issue. The jpeg I have on my desktop (1600 x 1067 pixels, the same dimensions I always use to post) looks
    amazing, but the image is getting blurry/soft as I post it to this site. This NEVER happened with my old computer and software. What the heck is happening?!?!? I am happy to email the jpeg so you can see what's going on.


    Canon 600mm f/4 IS II on EOS R5
    1/3200 at f/4, ISO 2000
    Processed in LR Classic on CC

    Name:  DCAP4096-Enhanced-NR.jpg
Views: 130
Size:  491.8 KB


    Last edited by Dorian Anderson; 06-06-2023 at 12:05 PM.

  2. #2
    Super Moderator Daniel Cadieux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    26,315
    Threads
    3,979
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Dorian, the image is appearing nice and sharp as posted for me. What do other folks' images look like? Are they all soft compared to before?

  3. #3
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    San Mateo, CA
    Posts
    3,643
    Threads
    398
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Daniel Cadieux View Post
    Dorian, the image is appearing nice and sharp as posted for me. What do other folks' images look like? Are they all soft compared to before?
    I wonder if it's an issue with my display. It's interesting, I was looking at my website (https://www.dorianandersonphotography.com/) at the Apple Store the other day and though that the
    images looked softer than they did on my home computer (i.e. my old iMac). When I looked at my website on this, my new iMac, they also look softer than I'm used to seeing. As I test, I just
    pulled up my website on my old iMac (sitting on my desk next to my new iMac) and there does appear to be a display difference, the images all being sharper on the old computer. The monitor
    is fine as the swallow jpeg I have on me desktop appears tack sharp, but something is getting lost (at least on my monitor) when I post that jpeg to this site or my website.

    As another test, I just looked at a bunch of recent posts on this site on my old and new computers, again side by side, and all images look slightly sharper on my old screen. So, it looks as
    if my new computer is having some difficult displaying online data as compared to my old one.

    Dan - could I email you a screenshot of my original jpeg next to the BPN posted image to confirm there is a difference before and after posting?
    Last edited by Dorian Anderson; 06-06-2023 at 12:45 PM.

  4. #4
    Super Moderator Daniel Cadieux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    26,315
    Threads
    3,979
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Glad to know it is looking like it is not just BPN (but no fun for you!). Maybe your new computer's resolution is not set to its recommended setting? Sure, you can send me a screenshot - at least it would confirm what you are seeing - send it at dancadphotography@gmail.com

  5. #5
    BPN Member Andreas Liedmann's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Dortmund / Germany
    Posts
    11,248
    Threads
    1,271
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Dorian ... regardless of your issues , here all looks good .
    Hope you can sort out your problems .

    A super image of the fast flying darters , very well in capture .
    All works well for me here , no nits .

    TFS Andreas

  6. #6
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    San Mateo, CA
    Posts
    3,643
    Threads
    398
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Dan confirmed there is a sharpness difference when presented with a screenshot of my the original jpeg (on my desktop) juxtaposed to my BPN post. It seems as though BPN is being displayed slightly differently on my old and new computers. Same for my website. Interestingly, my images as displayed in the Macaulay Library (a permanent electronic database to which I donate all my images) look sharper than on my old computer! Images on Facebook also look better on the new machine. So, it seems there's some amount of formatting/display/compression differences between the various websites which host images. The important thing for anyone reading this is that my images are coming through sharp on your end of BPN.

  7. #7
    Lifetime Member Colin Driscoll's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    Lake Macquarie, Australia
    Posts
    2,344
    Threads
    431
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Yep, actually the sharpest of you postings of the species IMO. Surely you can sort the problem out, Maybe a faulty monitor? Otherwise you will likely end up over sharpening.

  8. #8
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    San Mateo, CA
    Posts
    3,643
    Threads
    398
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Colin Driscoll View Post
    Yep, actually the sharpest of you postings of the species IMO. Surely you can sort the problem out, Maybe a faulty monitor? Otherwise you will likely end up over sharpening.
    I agree. This is my sharpest of the three Cliff Swallows I've recently posted. And my monitor is fine because the jpeg I exported from LR looks fantastic when I open it from my desktop. There's something with how my monitor is
    displaying web images on some pages. Your Lorikeet, for example, looks slightly sharper on my old iMac than it does on my new iMac. I might need to change a resolution setting (though I'm not sure how that happens on a retina
    display). Interestingly, my images posted to other websites look sharper on the new machine versus the old. It'll be interesting to see if anyone can make heads or tails of this.

  9. #9
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,689
    Threads
    1,296
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Dorian, the file is only 1600px wide (actual size), 4.5 inches in old money, if viewed bigger than this, then it will appear not pin sharp.
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  10. #10
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    San Mateo, CA
    Posts
    3,643
    Threads
    398
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Kaluski View Post
    Dorian, the file is only 1600px wide (actual size), 4.5 inches in old money, if viewed bigger than this, then it will appear not pin sharp.
    I understand this. What is your email? I will send you an example of what I'm talking about. You know lots about this sort of stuff so I'd love for you to see what I'm seeing. Thanks!

  11. #11
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,689
    Threads
    1,296
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Dorian, happy to look but can’t guarantee I will have the answer.

    In the meantime do me a favour… grab a PLASTIC ruler, open the image in PS, or export to the desktop and measure across the 1600px, 4.5 inch width, is it correct? On my Brand I can adjust so I see the actual output size at it’s true size.
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  12. #12
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,689
    Threads
    1,296
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Dorian, thanks for the screen shots, but in all honesty they don't help.

    Is your monitor 4k, if so, images appear far sharper than they are, it's the nature of the monitor.

    In Lr I assume you crop within the Dev module?
    Are you exporting from Lr or Exporting from Lr then sharpening via PS?
    If Exporting in Lr for web are you inputting the setting into the respective dialogue boxes? If so can you send me a screen grab of the boxes.
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  13. #13
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    San Mateo, CA
    Posts
    3,643
    Threads
    398
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I do everything in LR. No PS. This is not a workflow problem as I am doing everything exactly the same as I did on my old computer.

    I don't know what my monitor is. It's whatever the newest iMac is. I think that's 'retina 4K'.

    And I sent a screenshot of my export settings. Thanks.

  14. #14
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,689
    Threads
    1,296
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    If in LR, I assume you set the output size ie 1600, file size and sharpen screen???
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  15. #15
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,689
    Threads
    1,296
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Ah, ok saw the second email, looks right, so no idea. As I don’t use 4K, or have an Apple I’m unsure, no idea if you can set any Prefs on them, or calibrate. If anyone else has the same monitor as you, do they see your images as soft?

    I still think within BPN, files are scaled up for viewing but no one has confirmed that? Sorry drawn a blank.

    Can you try uploading at 1920px see if it looks soft?
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  16. #16
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    San Mateo, CA
    Posts
    3,643
    Threads
    398
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Image at 1920 wide:

    Name:  cliff swallow topside warm light 060523.jpg
Views: 90
Size:  379.2 KB

  17. #17
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    San Mateo, CA
    Posts
    3,643
    Threads
    398
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Yeah, same problem on my new iMac. And, again, it looks great on my old.

  18. #18
    Super Moderator arash_hazeghi's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    San Francisco, California, United States
    Posts
    18,556
    Threads
    1,321
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Image looks good in terms of sharpness, colors a bit muted

    Dorian, the softness or crunchiness is because of the display scaling. The Apple monitor has far more pixels than a standard monitor (most iMac is 5K) but it is only 27" or 24", this means the pixels are tiny. If every pixel of content is mapped to one pixel on the monitor text and icons will become so small they won't be readable. To get around this Mac OS groups display pixels and repeats the same information for 2 or 3 pixels. This is a form of up-sampling and makes small content appear large and readable on a retina or super high-res screen. It works well for text but can make the images look a bit crunchy or soft, in other words it is not ideal for reference content creation.

    To get around this there are several solution, in programs like photoshop scaling can be disabled so the image will look crisp although might be too small. In Safari you can simply press CMND and - key to "zoom back" until it looks ok. If you have an external monitor or reference monitor like the Apple Pro XDR you can disable scaling entirely. I believe you cannot do that with the internal iMac display but I could be wrong. I disable scaling on my 32" 4K LG monitor, the fonts are a bit small and sometimes I need to magnify text to read it but it works


    go to settings-->display--> and chose "more space" in the resolution settings. if you hold your mouse over the example it shows you a number below the icon, if that number matches the nominal resolution of your monitor it means scaling is off. if this number is smaller than the resolution of your monitor it means scaling is active

    this article is not 100% correct but explains the concept behind display scaling

    https://appleinsider.com/inside/maco...e%20penalties.
    Last edited by arash_hazeghi; 06-13-2023 at 11:34 PM.
    New! Sony Capture One Pro Guide 2022
    https://arihazeghiphotography.com/Gu.../Sony_C1P.html


    ------------------------------------------------
    Visit my blog
    http://www.arihazeghiphotography.com/blog

  19. #19
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,689
    Threads
    1,296
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Nice one Arash, suggest you copy this to Digital Workflow as this is a huge help IMHO.
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics