Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: stork two

  1. #1
    BPN Member Volkan Akgul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Location
    World
    Posts
    792
    Threads
    83
    Thank You Posts

    Default stork two

    Name:  a5s.jpg
Views: 75
Size:  254.3 KB
    hi,
    Valuable criticisms are taken into account. Thank you.
    A1-200-600
    f6.3 1/3200 iso1250

  2. #2
    Macro and Flora Moderator Jonathan Ashton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Cheshire UK
    Posts
    17,017
    Threads
    2,604
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Focus and exposure look good, depth of field good. I don't think there's much to to do to improve the image, possibly a minor brightening around the eye.
    If it was the archetypal "good" image the wings would perhaps be a little lower and the angle of the bird coming slightly toward the camera. Its a pretty good image and I personally would not be unhappy with it - why not appreciate it for what it is rather than wish it was something else? - Just a thought.

  3. Thanks Volkan Akgul thanked for this post
  4. #3
    BPN Member Volkan Akgul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Location
    World
    Posts
    792
    Threads
    83
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    hi jon,
    I got the message ;)


    You are right, but it is a pleasure to seek and strive for better. Opinion. Thank you for your beautiful and meaningful suggestion.

  5. #4
    BPN Member William Dickson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Fife, Scotland
    Posts
    7,773
    Threads
    1,093
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Volkan....I like the flight pose and good detail on the bird...The greens along the bottom add so much to the frame....I would brighten the whole image up a little, see if it makes a difference.

    Will

  6. Thanks Volkan Akgul thanked for this post
  7. #5
    BPN Member Dorian Anderson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    San Mateo, CA
    Posts
    3,617
    Threads
    393
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Details on the back look good, but the head doesn't look as sharp. I assume the focus point fell on the wing? I agree the frame could be brightened a bit. Wing position isn't ideal; it would be nice to see more of the neck.

  8. Thanks Volkan Akgul thanked for this post
  9. #6
    BPN Member Volkan Akgul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Location
    World
    Posts
    792
    Threads
    83
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    If I give light, there may be an explosion in the head part. the sharpness is easy without disturbing the naturalness.
    thanks.

  10. #7
    BPN Member Andreas Liedmann's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Dortmund / Germany
    Posts
    10,906
    Threads
    1,196
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Volkan ... can only echo Dorian's thoughts here .
    Too dark , head not sharp and the blue of the sky is on the magenta side .
    Check the histogram .... then you see how much room there is on the RHS .... the head will not explode .

    You need to get your grips into the editing process , regardless of the camera manufacturer

    TFS Andreas

  11. Thanks Volkan Akgul thanked for this post
  12. #8
    BPN Member Volkan Akgul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Location
    World
    Posts
    792
    Threads
    83
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    hi Andreas,

    I would appreciate it if you could provide an example image. pertaining to sharpness and background
    Name:  a55.jpg
Views: 23
Size:  368.6 KB
    or is that what you mean

  13. #9
    BPN Member Andreas Liedmann's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Dortmund / Germany
    Posts
    10,906
    Threads
    1,196
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Hi Volkan ... your RP is even worse than the OP , now you have a yellow / green tinge in the darker plumage , and the sky did not change much . Sharpness on the head looks better

    You do not seem to control your colors before finalizing an image .... a key point that you are missing IMHO. Apart from different taste that we all might have .
    This is for sure only my opinion Volkan ... you and others might agree or not .

  14. Thanks Volkan Akgul thanked for this post
  15. #10
    BPN Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2020
    Location
    Sahuarita, AZ
    Posts
    1,004
    Threads
    150
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Volkan, nice work getting this in the first place! I do have to agree with Andreas and Dorian on their points. I think the repost Andreas did is a major improvement. Still nicely done!

  16. Thanks Volkan Akgul thanked for this post
  17. #11
    BPN Member Volkan Akgul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Location
    World
    Posts
    792
    Threads
    83
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Teşekkürler Andreas, güzel. bana daha iyi göründü.


    Burada olanları takdir ediyorum. Umarım değeri herkes tarafından bilinir. Doğru ve güzel olana ulaşmada bu sitenin ve üyelerinin katkısı büyük.

    teşekkürler kurt

  18. #12
    BPN Member Volkan Akgul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2020
    Location
    World
    Posts
    792
    Threads
    83
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Name:  a6s.jpg
Views: 16
Size:  361.5 KB
    Hmm :) Steve Kaluski should have been here too ..
    Last edited by Volkan Akgul; 04-12-2023 at 11:23 AM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics