Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Large World, Small Bird

  1. #1
    BPN Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Lakeland, FL
    Posts
    7,533
    Threads
    2,043
    Thank You Posts

    Default Large World, Small Bird

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    I captured this image of a Sanderling at Ft. Desoto County Park, Pinellas County, Florida, in September this year. Comments and critique welcomed and appreciated. Thank you for viewing.

    Nikon D500
    Nikon 500mm F/5.6 VR AF-S ED PF, camera and lens supported by a Oben carbon fiber monopod with a Wimberly MonoGimbal head
    1/3200 F/5.6 Matrix Metering EV 0 ISO 560 Auto 1 WB, image captured at 500mm (750mm 35mm Equivalent)
    Image post processed in Lightroom Classic, Photoshop CC 2021 and Neat Image for noise reduction
    Image cropped and canvas added for composition and presentation
    Joe Przybyla

    "Sometimes I do get to places just as God is ready to have somebody click the shutter"... Ansel Adams

    www.amazinglight.smugmug.com

  2. #2
    Macro and Flora Moderator Jonathan Ashton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Cheshire UK
    Posts
    17,325
    Threads
    2,662
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Not very often we see a static Sanderling, I like the light. There is a band of sand where the grains are visible but there are some irregular areas that look smooth, most apparent below the bird and to the right of the frame (??)

  3. Thanks Joseph Przybyla thanked for this post
  4. #3
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Oct 2020
    Location
    Sahuarita, AZ
    Posts
    1,004
    Threads
    150
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Nice low angle and love the placement of the bird tot he right. I'm back and forth about the amount of FG you left in the frame. I might cut a sliver off if it were mine.

  5. Thanks Joseph Przybyla thanked for this post
  6. #4
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,689
    Threads
    1,296
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Joe, I would go more pillar box ie 16x9, but still keeping the subject small in frame, perhaps RoT's on the height. I can see what Jon is referring to on both the RHS, plus LHS to me you just cloned/duplicated the area, but very noticeable. Because everything is so clean I would just Spot remove all those smaller specs in Lr. I like the colours, very simple and affective, good control of the Blacks & whites.

    TFS
    Steve
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  7. Thanks Joseph Przybyla thanked for this post
  8. #5
    BPN Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2014
    Location
    Lakeland, FL
    Posts
    7,533
    Threads
    2,043
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Thanks everyone for viewing, commenting and suggesting improvements. Here is a edit and repost reflecting those suggestions. I think the areas that needed fixing were from not using the right tool originally in Photoshop and not cleaning up after adding canvas. Thanks again...
    Joe Przybyla

    "Sometimes I do get to places just as God is ready to have somebody click the shutter"... Ansel Adams

    www.amazinglight.smugmug.com

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics