-
-
Macro and Flora Moderator
-
Wildlife Moderator
Hi Sanjeev, if you could have, then just a tad more DoF, even 5.6 rather than 5 would have been better. Sadly both the OP and Jon's RP aren't floating my boat, irrespective of viewing on the laptop. They both just don’t carry that tonal richness that this majestic of all cats has.
TFS
Steve
Last edited by Steve Kaluski; 12-07-2021 at 10:31 AM.
Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.
-
Macro and Flora Moderator
Steve do you mean they don't??
-
Wildlife Moderator
Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.
-
Thanks Jon and Steve. Appreciate the comments. Will work on it. Agree the DoF was thin.
-
Wildlife Moderator
The DoF is ‘ok’ but I just personally don’t shoot f/4 and albeit a fraction, I much prefer f/5.6 and you could have dropped to SS 1/1000.
Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.
-
-
BPN Member
-
Post a Thank You. - 1 Thanks
-
Wildlife Moderator
I think you should post a version Andreas, far easier to understand your comments visually.
Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.
-
Post a Thank You. - 1 Thanks
-
BPN Member
-
Post a Thank You. - 1 Thanks
-
Thanks Andreas for the RP. It looks good.
-
Hi Doc-- agree with the above , you need to revisit the image.
You have done quite well in managing this frame from the back seat.
TFS !