Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Sparrow Hawk (Juvenile) - Close up

  1. #1
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,690
    Threads
    1,296
    Thank You Posts

    Default Sparrow Hawk (Juvenile) - Close up

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    This is the juvenile after the adult female opened up the carcass. As I mentioned on the previous posting, I know the flaws re BKG, however it's always good to push at times IMHO, I'm not fussed so much on the ISO, but I do know what the R5 doesn't like, ooh to shoot below ISO1000, can only mage just how much more depth & detail would be achieved.

    Thanks to those who commented or viewed the last posting.

    Steve

    Subject: Sparrow hawk Juvenile (Accipiter nisus)
    Location: UK
    Camera: Canon EOS R5
    Lens: EF500mm f/4L IS II USM +1.4x III
    Exposure: 1/1000s at f/7.1 ISO6400
    Original format: Portrait, FF width, crop from the bottom up
    Processed via: LRCC 10.5 & PSCC 22.5.1

    Shot from our hide, baited with road kill.
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  2. #2
    Macro and Flora Moderator Jonathan Ashton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Cheshire UK
    Posts
    17,336
    Threads
    2,666
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I wouldn't be at all concerned about detail, it looks great to me! Colours look good and I like the muted background
    Background flaws - you're looking too hard! Pixel peeper!! The bird is just fine!!
    I feel the bill is just a little short on DOF but I think that is fairly inconsequential.
    If you have one with the legs in I would love to see it.

  3. #3
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,690
    Threads
    1,296
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Cheers Jon.

    I feel the bill is just a little short on DOF but I think that is fairly inconsequential.
    I was shooting a mixture of apertures ie f7.1 - f/9 just wanted to keep at 6400, far higher than folk go to, but agree Jon.

    If you have one with the legs in I would love to see it.
    I deliberately keep away from showing too much around the feet and tried more for the head posture/character of the subject if that makes sense, but I might post something in due course...
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  4. #4
    BPN Member Jack Backs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Ofallon, Missouri, USA
    Posts
    570
    Threads
    141
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Looks good to me. I'd be inclined to dodge the perimeter of the beak to delineate it from the background a little better.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics