Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Red deer hind (Cervus elaphus)

  1. #1
    Macro and Flora Moderator Jonathan Ashton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Cheshire UK
    Posts
    17,331
    Threads
    2,663
    Thank You Posts

    Default Red deer hind (Cervus elaphus)

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Red deer hind, very patchy light this day and I quite liked how she was illuminated against the trees.
    (I hope it looks sharp, on the BPN website it does not look sharp to me but it does in PSCC)

    Model Name : E-M1X
    Focal Length : 194.0mm
    Focal length in 35 mm film : 389.0mm
    Exposure mode : Manual exposure
    ISO Sensitivity : 400
    Exposure compensation : -1.0 EV
    Shutter : 1/640 sec
    Aperture : F6.3

    ACR/PSCC

  2. #2
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,689
    Threads
    1,296
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Jon, nice to have the light and having a darker BKG helps for sure. You don't say, but if this is FF the I again feel, you are too tight at the foot, moving the whole frame down a bit more would help. Have you darkened the lower RHC?

    I think it is a tad heavy on the Blacks, some minor clipping but just having a bit less just opens the whole content up a bit more and I think there is a small patch of colour noise on that LHS? The bramch going into the rear of the body is a bit unfortunate, I would break it and slightly tone down that area. The coat is, or appears to be in moult and sadly less attractive, I might run a lights Curve just to pull a little down. Is it sharp, yes in PS it is better and certainly as displayed it has lost some in resolution, but could go a little more crisper to my rye.

    TFS
    Steve.
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  3. #3
    Story Sequences Moderator and Wildlife Moderator Gabriela Plesea's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2013
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    7,834
    Threads
    461
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Good morning Jon,

    Love the colours here and great to see the beautiful, rich environment the species live in. I guess you were so taken with those trees in the BG that you might have forgotten to allow for the virtual limbs of the bokkie... can you add a bit?
    Pose is nice with good HA, I like the POV. Was it really necessary to underexpose? Not saying it's good or bad, just interested to understand your thinking behind it.
    Agree with Steve regarding dark branch at the rear of the animal. Overall subject looks sharp enough to me too, maybe a tad more needed on the face and especially eye.
    Thank you so much for sharing!

    Warmest regards,
    Gabriela Plesea

  4. #4
    Macro and Flora Moderator Jonathan Ashton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Cheshire UK
    Posts
    17,331
    Threads
    2,663
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Steve, Gabriel, yes there is more at the base - just checked and indeed it does look better with more at the base. The deer was as you can see very bright I exposed to the point that the deer was only just clipped, I reduced the highlights in the deer a lot and I raised the blacks in the trees. The base has a grad filter with negative exposure.
    Sharpening - maybe I'll be better after my eye test and I suspect new glasses, previously you thought I was over sharpening, this time there is hardly any sharpening whatsoever on the jpeg, I use an action (yes I know a deep sigh!!) but it can be tailored and I used 5% as opposed to the regular 30-50%, perhaps I could have used a little more and brushed the amount selectively.

  5. #5
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,689
    Threads
    1,296
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I reduced the highlights in the deer a lot and I raised the blacks in the trees.
    Leave the trees open as you are Globally affecting everting.

    I use an action (yes I know a deep sigh!!) but it can be tailored and I used 5% as opposed to the regular 30-50%, perhaps I could have used a little more and brushed the amount selectively.
    PSCC still retains the best sharping and yes, you can tailor make with layers & masks.
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  6. #6
    Macro and Flora Moderator Jonathan Ashton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Cheshire UK
    Posts
    17,331
    Threads
    2,663
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Steve I used masking on the trees.

  7. #7
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,689
    Threads
    1,296
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Personally I wouldn’t, I rarely add, primarily decrease within Lr…
    Last edited by Jonathan Ashton; 10-31-2021 at 09:26 AM.
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  8. #8
    Macro and Flora Moderator Jonathan Ashton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Cheshire UK
    Posts
    17,331
    Threads
    2,663
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Kaluski View Post
    Personally I wouldn’t, I rarely add, primarily decrease within Lr…
    Because you would prefer to adjust data as opposed to pixels?

  9. #9
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,689
    Threads
    1,296
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Two words Jon - ‘Smart Objects’
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  10. #10
    Macro and Flora Moderator Jonathan Ashton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Cheshire UK
    Posts
    17,331
    Threads
    2,663
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Here's an alternative, how about the sharpening and the trees?

  11. #11
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,689
    Threads
    1,296
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Jon, any sharpening for PI or Web is all subjective, you have better form/tones in the OP IMHO, but guess you are starting from scratch rather than updating a PSD. Foliage is also a bit better, but less so in the shadow I think, you have raised things too much???? Whats the vignette, why is there a dark/sooty FG????
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  12. #12
    Macro and Flora Moderator Jonathan Ashton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Cheshire UK
    Posts
    17,331
    Threads
    2,663
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    OK thanks Steve.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics