-
-
Avian Moderator
David:
I like the comp, and although the reeds below are rather 'busy' the head is nicely displayed because of the DOF, and it works well for me.
I don't know the answer to your question, but did think the bird was a bit washed out compared to those that I have seen, both in Florida and up north, so you may very well be right.
Cheers
Randy
MY BPN ALBUMS
"Tact is the art of making a point without making an enemy" Sir Isaac Newton
-
Post a Thank You. - 1 Thanks
-
Wildlife Moderator
Hi David, overall I quite like it, but being almost side on has helped, albeit I think the head is just slightly turned away. The NR is perhaps a fraction too strong, but all personal tastes, this is partly why I like Adobe as you can see whats being applied. The single stem hitting the back of the neck is a little unfortunate. I'm assuming you are using Animal Eye detect, but what Case setting are you using and you have AI servo?
TFS
Steve
Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

-
Post a Thank You. - 1 Thanks
-
Thanks gents for the inputs. The sloped bank helped with this one. Getting exactly even would have been all OOF foreground reeds. Getting too high would have ruined perspective. Got just high enough to get the head clear. And yes, a better HA would have been real nice. Yeah, Steve, I move the noise sliders by feel and could have been too aggressive. I am in ai servo, face detect 95% of the time. Have learned quick touch on shutter to obviate need for single shot. Case 2, sensitivity -2, accel\decel +1. I know you have said use defaults on case 2, but I find these settings working so far. For instance, this guy flew soon after this frame right through dock pilings and every frame was in focus. Unfortunately all frames were angled away from me but all in focus. Thanks again gents for your always valued help.
-
Wildlife Moderator
Case 2, sensitivity -2, accel\decel +1. I know you have said use defaults on case 2, but I find these settings working so far.
I think what I might have suggested what was - 'correct for the situation', for this situation -2 isn't required IMHO, the subject is static and nothing is in the way or moving across, so locking on and retaining lock on would not be a problem here David, however yes perhaps to +1 for any movement, but again it's not a species that is constantly 'on the go', you may have found 0, 0, better???? With the current tech settings when he bolted, I doubt there would be any frames as keeps though???
Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

-
Post a Thank You. - 1 Thanks
-

Originally Posted by
Steve Kaluski
I think what I might have suggested what was - 'correct for the situation', for this situation -2 isn't required IMHO, the subject is static and nothing is in the way or moving across, so locking on and retaining lock on would not be a problem here David, however yes perhaps to +1 for any movement, but again it's not a species that is constantly 'on the go', you may have found 0, 0, better???? With the current tech settings when he bolted, I doubt there would be any frames as keeps though???
I hear you, professor, and grateful as always for the help.
-
The setting makes this for me. Almost always near or in water.
-
Post a Thank You. - 1 Thanks