-
Wildlife Moderator
-
Post a Thank You. - 1 Thanks
-
BPN Member
-
Wildlife Moderator
the oxpecker should have gone, destroying the body shape.
Doubt anyone would notice if I hadn't mentioned it.
Needs more space at the bottom , IMHO , as those legs are very long .
Think that's magical Andreas as you can easily gauge where the feet are, but could extend a fraction more.
Cheers
Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.
-
What a beast. That hair on his neck and those three white dots along the jaw are pretty neat. Love how the antlers curl.
-
BPN Member
Steve .... most of folks would not have noticed the OP , and I meant he should have gone in reality .... not via removing in post . I would personally not remove such element ....
To avoid the canvas extension .... shooting wider if possible , would have been the better way .
Cheers Andreas
-
Macro and Flora Moderator
Beautiful tones and colours, the coat markings are shown to good effect. The horns (not antlers I think) look most impressive. I appreciate a little more canvas at the base would have been good.
-
Wildlife Moderator
Thanks folks, but I'm OK with the foot of the framing, so no need for additional canvas I feel, as if it was added, it would be minimal IMHO.
Horns, correct Jon, thank you.
Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.
-
BPN Member
hi Steve,
perfect! : eek3:
-
Story Sequences Moderator and Wildlife Moderator