Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: Muskrat Buffet

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2020
    Location
    Littleton, CO
    Posts
    63
    Threads
    13
    Thank You Posts

    Default Muskrat Buffet

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Muskrat eating clams in the Platte River.

    Nikon D500 500mm f/4 with 1.4 Teleconverter
    1/2000 f/9 ISO 1400 -.3ev

    WB in ACR, Topaz for noise reduction.

    Looking forward to feedback.

  2. #2
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Ithaca, NY
    Posts
    10,421
    Threads
    1,708
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Really digging this one. I like the reflection and the eating pose. Nice and sharp. I like the slightly ripply water. The clams make this one for me. Never knew they ate clams.

  3. #3
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2020
    Location
    Littleton, CO
    Posts
    63
    Threads
    13
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by John Mack View Post
    Really digging this one. I like the reflection and the eating pose. Nice and sharp. I like the slightly ripply water. The clams make this one for me. Never knew they ate clams.

    Thanks John, I never new the clams existed in the river where I found this guy. I have since found a couple larger area where it has piled up quite a large number of shells.

  4. #4
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,688
    Threads
    1,296
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Vaughn, I like the POV slightly looking down and having the reflection in, but once you got this in the bag shooting tighter, wider, landscape would give you more choice later on, once back home. I could see an alternative where shot landscape with the subject to the left and having more negative space, with habitat to the RHS. The clam shells are a nice touch and adds interest. At ISO1400 I'm surprised you needed any NR, but the Nikon500 might not be good at highish ISO, but it's given the BKG for me, too smooth a backdrop which jars slightly with the sharpness of the subject, if this was Auto then you need to tweak the settings IMHO so it has more of a natural look. The blue is a bit OTT unless it's from something close by, again I would be tempted to pull that back so it's a lot softer, I bet the shells were more of a pale blue. Is this a crop?

    Just on a 'Housekeeping note', we tend to suggest posters reply to 3-5 posts to one posting, it doesn't have to be technical, but builds on the community spirit. Look forward too more.

    TFS
    Steve
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  5. #5
    Macro and Flora Moderator Jonathan Ashton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Cheshire UK
    Posts
    17,279
    Threads
    2,650
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I think this is the first muskrat image I have seen on the forum, it looks very much at ease chewing away there. I too was surprised to see it eating clams, (I did a quick google and around 90% of diet is vegetarian). I like the pose and the composition, the image looks very clean in terms of noise..... did you apply NR to the subject?

  6. #6
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2020
    Location
    Littleton, CO
    Posts
    63
    Threads
    13
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jonathan Ashton View Post
    I think this is the first muskrat image I have seen on the forum, it looks very much at ease chewing away there. I too was surprised to see it eating clams, (I did a quick google and around 90% of diet is vegetarian). I like the pose and the composition, the image looks very clean in terms of noise..... did you apply NR to the subject?
    Ashton thanks for the comments. Yes ran Topaz DeNoise minimal setting to remove noise from water. I have captured this little critter eating crawdads as well, but most often underwater roots.


    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Kaluski View Post
    Hi Vaughn, I like the POV slightly looking down and having the reflection in, but once you got this in the bag shooting tighter, wider, landscape would give you more choice later on, once back home. I could see an alternative where shot landscape with the subject to the left and having more negative space, with habitat to the RHS. The clam shells are a nice touch and adds interest. At ISO1400 I'm surprised you needed any NR, but the Nikon500 might not be good at highish ISO, but it's given the BKG for me, too smooth a backdrop which jars slightly with the sharpness of the subject, if this was Auto then you need to tweak the settings IMHO so it has more of a natural look. The blue is a bit OTT unless it's from something close by, again I would be tempted to pull that back so it's a lot softer, I bet the shells were more of a pale blue. Is this a crop?

    Just on a 'Housekeeping note', we tend to suggest posters reply to 3-5 posts to one posting, it doesn't have to be technical, but builds on the community spirit. Look forward too more.

    TFS
    Steve
    Thanks Steve for the suggestions. I did do a horizontal, the rock gets larger to the right and was bothering me, wish it had been small enough to do a full capture of rock and Muskrat. D500 is best at 800 and under, its APS sensor. The Bright blue water is bothering me as well I think it's the only water not moving and catching the bright blue sky we have in Colorado. Had hoped to catch the shakeoff when exiting the water maybe next time. Looking forward to seeing what these ideas evolve this image into.

  7. #7
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,688
    Threads
    1,296
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Hi Vaughn, here I might just simply reduce the Blue in saturation, but applied as a layer mask adjustment so it doesn't affect anything else, or you can just make it a Global adjustment, just depends on what you want. Just lifting/lightening the whole image and then with some more localise sharping just elevates the image which is already a cool image.

    Steve
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  8. Thanks Vaughn Larsen thanked for this post
  9. #8
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2020
    Location
    Littleton, CO
    Posts
    63
    Threads
    13
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Kaluski View Post
    Hi Vaughn, here I might just simply reduce the Blue in saturation, but applied as a layer mask adjustment so it doesn't affect anything else, or you can just make it a Global adjustment, just depends on what you want. Just lifting/lightening the whole image and then with some more localise sharping just elevates the image which is already a cool image.

    Steve
    Thanks much Steve, I definitely like the less saturated blue - now we'll see if I can replicate. thx again.

  10. #9
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,688
    Threads
    1,296
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Just do it all in PS if you want to be specific and use an adjustment layer with a mask, or Global in the raw converter. If you do it in PS change the Blend Mode to Saturation.
    Post Production: It’s ALL about what you do with the tools and not, which brand of tool you use.

  11. Thanks Vaughn Larsen thanked for this post

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics