Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: Wilson's Phalarope at Sunset

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Eagle Mountain, Utah
    Posts
    2,709
    Threads
    475
    Thank You Posts

    Default Wilson's Phalarope at Sunset

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    I made this image in Antelope Island State Park, UT.

    Camera Settings:-
    ===============
    Nikon D850 600 f/4 + 1.4 x TCIII
    1/1600 f/9 ISO1250
    Manual; Matrix metering


    Post Processing:-
    ===============
    Raw Processing using C1P 20
    Crop from top left side
    Tonal Adjustments in Viveza
    Neat Image NR
    Sharpening for Presentation
    Dodge selectively
    Cloned distracting elements in the background

    Let me know your thoughts and comments.

    Thanks
    Krishna

  2. #2
    BPN Member dankearl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    8,833
    Threads
    1,358
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Very nice angle and light. How big a crop?
    The IQ is not great, with your equipment this should be much better.
    Why f9, it does you nothing except add iso.
    Stopping down except for close up portraits is useless with big lens.
    You added no DOF at the distance you shot at.
    Dan Kearl

  3. #3
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Eagle Mountain, Utah
    Posts
    2,709
    Threads
    475
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by dankearl View Post
    Very nice angle and light. How big a crop?
    The IQ is not great, with your equipment this should be much better.
    Why f9, it does you nothing except add iso.
    Stopping down except for close up portraits is useless with big lens.
    You added no DOF at the distance you shot at.
    I disagree, I think image quality is good. Not sure if you opened the image in a new tab. I have this issue in Bird photographers.net website, I always open the image in a new tab so see it to see image quality
    With respect to f/9 I wanted to have the whole bird in focus and hence stopped down

  4. #4
    BPN Member dankearl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    8,833
    Threads
    1,358
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    The image is crunchy, the eye and head are not sharp.
    You gain nothing at f9 at the distance.
    F5.6 is great for most anything posted here, almost all BIF is shot wide open.
    Continue if you want, you only hurt IQ with higher iso.
    What new tab are you talking about, I view every image the same way?
    Last edited by dankearl; 07-29-2020 at 10:22 PM.
    Dan Kearl

  5. #5
    BPN Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Location
    Sunrise, Fl
    Posts
    3,241
    Threads
    525
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Another beauty with great light, nice low POV, spot on EXP for details(especially in the white chin) and colors, awesome still but soft reflection and I love the feathers on water. TFS

  6. Thanks Krishna Prasad kotti thanked for this post
  7. #6
    Super Moderator Daniel Cadieux's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Ottawa, Canada
    Posts
    26,315
    Threads
    3,979
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Good low angle, lovely light, and the rising foot is excellent. I love the feather below the bird, but would be temped to eliminate the other one. The IQ looks ok to me, but I do feel there is a bit of an "oversharpened" look to it, especially the face and neck.

  8. Thanks Krishna Prasad kotti thanked for this post
  9. #7
    BPN Member William Dickson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Fife, Scotland
    Posts
    7,883
    Threads
    1,115
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I agree that it looks a wee bit over sharpened especially about the head area. All else looks good to me...Nice POV and the reflection adds

    Will

  10. Thanks Krishna Prasad kotti thanked for this post
  11. #8
    Avian Moderator Brian Sump's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2020
    Location
    Golden, CO
    Posts
    2,665
    Threads
    231
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Krishna, I see the same as mentioned however for me the setting has a super nice soft feel and water color and reflection are very nice. Truthfully, I want the whole reflection here; just a bit too much of a tease for me as-is.

    Also, just personal preference but your frames are so simple and captivating that it feels like it's worth cloning out those imperfections in the water.

    Look forward to more...

  12. Thanks Krishna Prasad kotti thanked for this post
  13. #9
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Eagle Mountain, Utah
    Posts
    2,709
    Threads
    475
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Brian Sump View Post
    Krishna, I see the same as mentioned however for me the setting has a super nice soft feel and water color and reflection are very nice. Truthfully, I want the whole reflection here; just a bit too much of a tease for me as-is.

    Also, just personal preference but your frames are so simple and captivating that it feels like it's worth cloning out those imperfections in the water.

    Look forward to more...
    Thanks Brain. I have other images with full reflections. Haven't gotten a chance to look into the same.
    I tend to keep some imperfections in the water not to make it too sterile etc.
    I did clone quite a few spots for this shot.

    TFS

  14. #10
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Eagle Mountain, Utah
    Posts
    2,709
    Threads
    475
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thank you all for the comments/suggestions.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics