Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Red Grouse

  1. #1
    BPN Member William Dickson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Fife, Scotland
    Posts
    7,883
    Threads
    1,115
    Thank You Posts

    Default Red Grouse

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Canon 1DX Mk2
    f/4 400mm DO Mk2 with 1.4iii
    f/5.6
    1/640
    ISO 1000

    This is one from my last visit to the Glen before lockdown...

    Will

  2. #2
    BPN Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Waynesville, Ohio, United States
    Posts
    1,354
    Threads
    228
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Beautiful Will everything looks good. Always enjoy looking at your Grouse Pictures.

  3. #3
    BPN Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Location
    Sunrise, Fl
    Posts
    3,241
    Threads
    525
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Man, that eye brow and that eye, not to mention the feather details and colors. The near OOF BG vegetation could use further NR. Love the composition overall. TFS

  4. #4
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Ithaca, NY
    Posts
    10,421
    Threads
    1,708
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Love the color on these grouse frames you produce. The setting and background are spot on. Framing is nice as well.

  5. #5
    Macro and Flora Moderator Jonathan Ashton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Cheshire UK
    Posts
    17,324
    Threads
    2,661
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Very nice indeed Will, I like the colours and framing.
    Being rather picky now but i would be very tempted to check out highlights and the blacks, there is a small amount of clipping. I think you have a good raw file to work from and I feel there is more detail to be shown in the lores, wattle and the breast feathers.
    (If you really look at the lores and wattle they are just a little bit glaring - compare to the white moustache like stripe where there is much better detail..WDYT??)

  6. #6
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,689
    Threads
    1,296
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Hi Will, the crop isn't working for me, as it's too 50/50, for me shooting wider with the habitat more in view would have been better. So removing the 1.4 would have also offered better cropping opportunities and more below. Still not sure why you don't go for a faster SS and here you could have gained some more DoF too, to get some of that body plumage in focus. Yes the ISO would have gone up, but again, you have a MK2 don't let old habits tether you.

    Agree with Jon, Blacks and shadows are masking some of the detail, the comb is way too saturated masking detail and the plumage could gain some more 'richness' within it, saying that killer BKG.

    Will, you can so much more with your files and you owe it to both subject and yourself, just decide what needs doing and stick to it, it's not complicated.

    TFS
    Steve

    PS The attached is just a suggestion...

  7. #7
    BPN Member Jack Backs's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Ofallon, Missouri, USA
    Posts
    570
    Threads
    141
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Beautiful image. The red detail is killer.

  8. #8
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    San Mateo, CA
    Posts
    3,643
    Threads
    398
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Really sweet! I'm a huge fan of headshots sho this sits very well with me. Love the color and detail, and the foliage is interesting even if the OOF bits create a bit of a pattern artifact in front and behind. I do think Steve's repost
    looks better suggested the comb too saturated in the original. Very minor though, and this is an image I'd be stoked to have in my collection.

  9. #9
    BPN Member dankearl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    8,833
    Threads
    1,358
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I like the repost, very nice portrait, Will...
    Dan Kearl

  10. #10
    BPN Member William Dickson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Fife, Scotland
    Posts
    7,883
    Threads
    1,115
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks guys appreciated and comments noted.

  11. #11
    BPN Member William Dickson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Fife, Scotland
    Posts
    7,883
    Threads
    1,115
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Steve Kaluski View Post
    Hi Will, the crop isn't working for me, as it's too 50/50, for me shooting wider with the habitat more in view would have been better. So removing the 1.4 would have also offered better cropping opportunities and more below. Still not sure why you don't go for a faster SS and here you could have gained some more DoF too, to get some of that body plumage in focus. Yes the ISO would have gone up, but again, you have a MK2 don't let old habits tether you.

    Agree with Jon, Blacks and shadows are masking some of the detail, the comb is way too saturated masking detail and the plumage could gain some more 'richness' within it, saying that killer BKG.

    Will, you can so much more with your files and you owe it to both subject and yourself, just decide what needs doing and stick to it, it's not complicated.

    TFS
    Steve

    PS The attached is just a suggestion...
    Thanks for the RP Steve...I like it apart from the comb...The photograph was during the mating season, and the males combs are really bright at this time. They are almost fluorescent...

    Will

  12. #12
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,689
    Threads
    1,296
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    The photograph was during the mating season, and the males combs are really bright at this time. They are almost fluorescent...
    Appreciate that Will, but you can retain detail too, as I'm guessing they are the same as up here in N Yorkshire. Yes, it's a balancing act, but retaining detail is also key.

  13. #13
    BPN Member Andreas Liedmann's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Dortmund / Germany
    Posts
    11,246
    Threads
    1,269
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Will apart from the minor issues in terms of color and tone , I like this one !!! Nice looking bird . Crop matter of taste ... I am ok with it .

    Agree with Steve , why you do not push the cam more in terms of iso to gain more DOF and/or shutter speed .

    TFS Andreas

  14. #14
    BPN Member William Dickson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    Fife, Scotland
    Posts
    7,883
    Threads
    1,115
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Andreas Liedmann View Post
    Hi Will apart from the minor issues in terms of color and tone , I like this one !!! Nice looking bird . Crop matter of taste ... I am ok with it .

    Agree with Steve , why you do not push the cam more in terms of iso to gain more DOF and/or shutter speed .

    TFS Andreas
    Thanks Andreas.....Confidence I suppose...But, I'm getting there.....I'll post one later on with a higher ISO

    Will

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics