Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: After branch placement, he shakes and fluffs

  1. #1
    BPN Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2018
    Location
    Sunrise, Fl
    Posts
    3,241
    Threads
    525
    Thank You Posts

    Default After branch placement, he shakes and fluffs

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    EOS R EF400 DO I 2xtc II f11 1/200 ISO 2000

    One last image of the cleaner nest from that dark/blustery morning. At this shutter speed, the beginning of his shake off has slight motion blur, which I like. In the following frames he covers her. My main question is did I successfully remove magenta cast? Cropped from horizontal and a little off the top as both had necks pulled. My vertical tries at this length almost always cut wings.
    Thanks as always for valued inputs.

  2. #2
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Bahrain
    Posts
    404
    Threads
    36
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Nice frame, David. Sounds like you had some difficult light. I like the windswept plumage and the contrast between the birds and the background.

    I find the details quite muddy, possibly due to motion blur or excessive NR. If the RAW is sharp, then I think you'd be able to squeeze more details out of the birds with some careful processing. I don't see a magenta cast, but I'd probably warm the image up a touch. More room at the bottom of the frame would also help as the legs are too close to the edge of the frame IMO. Hope that helps

    TFS

  3. Thanks David Roach thanked for this post
  4. #3
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Ithaca, NY
    Posts
    10,421
    Threads
    1,708
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Nice to have almost identical poses. The setting is great. Nice to have that distant background as well.

  5. Thanks David Roach thanked for this post
  6. #4
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    San Mateo, CA
    Posts
    3,643
    Threads
    398
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Color balance looks OK to me, and the birds stand out nicely from the underlying sticks. Their faces looked a bit smoothed out, perhaps from NR? Any reason you went with f/11 and ISO 2000 as opposed to f/8 and ISO 1000? I wouldn't think you'd need the extra DOF in this instance. Square-ish crop is a bit awkward as well. Curious how it would look with more traditional proportions.

  7. Thanks David Roach thanked for this post

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics