Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Dunlin

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Bahrain
    Posts
    404
    Threads
    36
    Thank You Posts

    Default Dunlin

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    This image was shot on a very cloudy day (at this point I've forgotten what the sun looks like). Even at 500mm, framing this Dunlin was a massive challenge as it came very close and I clipped the tail in most of the other shots from the sequence. I haven't cloned out too many things - only a couple of spots on the water and the legs. The legs are out of focus even after stopping down 2/3rd of a stop, unfortunately.

    Camera - Nikon D850

    Focal Length - 500mm
    Aperture - f/7.1
    Shutter Speed - 1/1250s
    ISO - 4000
    Handheld
    Manual, Auto ISO
    80-85% of Full-frame
    As always, all comments & CC are appreciated!
    Last edited by Aditya Sridhar; 01-09-2020 at 04:29 PM.

  2. #2
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2016
    Location
    Princeton, NJ
    Posts
    1,643
    Threads
    182
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I like the setting and the raised foot adds a lot. To me, the bird is a bit large in the frame. Details look good but some parts look like they have motion blur, although I do realize that you were up against some lighting challenges. TFS

  3. Thanks Aditya Sridhar thanked for this post
  4. #3
    BPN Member dankearl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    8,833
    Threads
    1,358
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    You were a bit too close for focus....A good problem to have in most cases, but in this one,
    It is probably about as good result as you could get.
    Dan Kearl

  5. Thanks Aditya Sridhar thanked for this post
  6. #4
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Eagle Mountain, Utah
    Posts
    2,709
    Threads
    475
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I agree with the comments. I do see the motion blur, with subject too close I would have stopped down more.

    I do not like the bright stripe in the bottom as it is distracting to my eye.

    TFS

  7. Thanks Aditya Sridhar thanked for this post
  8. #5
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Ithaca, NY
    Posts
    10,421
    Threads
    1,708
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    The low angle is right on. Nice Detail on the bird.

  9. Thanks Aditya Sridhar thanked for this post
  10. #6
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    May 2017
    Location
    Bahrain
    Posts
    404
    Threads
    36
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks all for the comments. I do not see any motion blur except on the legs, but they were out-of-focus anyway and the bird was moving *fast*.

    Krishna - I could not stop down as the light was very low (I was at ISO 4000 here). And my lens didn't like the wave either

  11. Thanks Krishna Prasad kotti thanked for this post
  12. #7
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    San Mateo, CA
    Posts
    3,643
    Threads
    398
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    This looks pretty good given the challenging lighting conditions. The bird is sharp where it needs to be - i.e. the head - and your inability to close down further given the light explains the rest. I applaud the effort to get so low! And yes, the bird
    is a bit big in the frame, but you were on top of him at the time of capture.

  13. Thanks Aditya Sridhar thanked for this post

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics