Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Tree Swallow

  1. #1
    BPN Member dankearl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    8,825
    Threads
    1,355
    Thank You Posts

    Default Tree Swallow

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    D500, 500mm (300 w/1.7), 1/2000, f5, iso900

    DSC_4658bp2.jpg
    Dan Kearl

  2. #2
    BPN Member Dorian Anderson's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2018
    Location
    San Mateo, CA
    Posts
    3,617
    Threads
    393
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    These make for very challenging flight subjects, so you did well to get him to get him squared up. The head looks really good, but left wing coming directly out of the plane of focus is really tough. It looks like you were right on top of him because of the compressed focal plane and lack of space around the bird. If you have more room around him I would use it; he's really constricted as is.

  3. #3
    BPN Member dankearl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    8,825
    Threads
    1,355
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Thanks, Dorian, you are correct as usual.
    A repost with more room.
    Challenging does not describe.
    500 frames this afternoon to get this one.

    DSC_4658bp5.jpg
    Dan Kearl

  4. #4
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Eagle Mountain, Utah
    Posts
    2,709
    Threads
    475
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    They are challenging subjects. I tired a lot last year and could not get one decent shot.

    This looks really nice.

    I like the sharp eye.

    Report is much better. I would have more room in the front .

    TFS

  5. #5
    BPN Member dankearl's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Portland, Oregon
    Posts
    8,825
    Threads
    1,355
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Thanks Krishna, appreciate it, just keep shooting..
    Full frame vertical repost although swallow was on the left side of frame, not dead center.
    I had a lot of near misses, 1/2000 way too slow.
    I was shooting Ospreys nesting 50 yards away and did this for fun in between.
    I will go shoot bare 300 lens next time.

    DSC_4658bpff.jpg
    Last edited by dankearl; 04-07-2019 at 12:17 AM.
    Dan Kearl

  6. #6
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,549
    Threads
    1,284
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Nice one Dan, hard to shoot, so kudos in getting this.

    My only thought is just to open the black/shadow (around the eye) area up up a fraction, as there is lots of detail there, even as web image. Then 10x8 (crop from the bottom up) loose some off the top and less to the RHS & a tad more to the left, to fly into.

    TFS
    Steve

  7. #7
    Avian Moderator Randy Stout's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    SW Michigan
    Posts
    14,112
    Threads
    820
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Dan:

    Far prefer the looser crop, plus increased apparent sharpness when not cropped in too tight.

    I have tried a number of times with these guys, and let me say that my yield rate has been abysmal!

    Randy
    MY BPN ALBUMS

    "Tact is the art of making a point without making an enemy" Sir Isaac Newton

  8. #8
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2014
    Location
    Norfolk. UK
    Posts
    915
    Threads
    208
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    A good shot of a very difficult subject, don't know how you managed to even keep it in the frame. A higher shutter speed might help with an even crisper shot but to me it's all about acquiring the subject and keeping it long enough in the frame. Well done!

  9. #9
    Publisher Arthur Morris's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    Indian Lake Estates, FL
    Posts
    32,506
    Threads
    1,433
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Randy, When you loosen the crop, you increase the image quality. I would not mind seeing the blue of the head a bit denser/darker ... Dan -- have you checked out the brightness of the pixels on the white rump?

    with love, artie
    BIRDS AS ART Blog: great info and lessons, lots of images with our legendary BAA educational Captions; we will not sell you junk. 30+ years of long lens experience/e-mail with gear questions.

    BIRDS AS ART Online Store: we will not sell you junk. 35 years of long lens experience. Please e-mail with gear questions.

    Check out the new SONY e-Guide and videos that I did with Patrick Sparkman here. Ten percent discount for BPN members,

    E-mail me at samandmayasgrandpa@att.net.










  10. #10
    BPN Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Ithaca, NY
    Posts
    10,421
    Threads
    1,708
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Stated seeing this guys this week. Really wish that front wing was up. Nice background.

  11. #11
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Dec 2018
    Location
    Stockholm, Sweden
    Posts
    292
    Threads
    38
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Great catch Dan! I would go for the third and last repost as the image quality and the comp works best. The light, bg and exposure is all very good! Catching these birds in flight against a good BG can't be easy.
    I do wish that the near-wing wasn't so close to the face and raised a bit. I would also darken the whites on the rump.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics