Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Bull Elk

  1. #1
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Ithaca, NY
    Posts
    10,421
    Threads
    1,708
    Thank You Posts

    Default Bull Elk

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    This image was created in Benezette, Pennsylvania on 9/27/18 at 5:12PM. Image adjustments in Lightroom and Photoshop.

    Hand held, Small crop.

    Canon 5D MarkIV
    Sigma 150-600 Contemporary
    324mm
    ISO 4000
    f8.0
    1/200sec

  2. #2
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Oct 2017
    Location
    Wonga Beach, FNQ
    Posts
    585
    Threads
    98
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I like this view of the elk, shows off the rack well, and it stand out well against the wooded background. Maybe needs a little more at the bottom for the ends of the legs if you have it.

  3. Thanks John Mack thanked for this post
  4. #3
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi John - That looks like a really wide rack. I find the comp slightly awkward and might have gone landscape to include the whole bull. Colors look better here.

    TFS,
    Rachel

  5. Thanks John Mack thanked for this post
  6. #4
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,690
    Threads
    1,296
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi John, I think this illustrates where looking at the LCD screen helps, but ONLY for comp and to show distracting elements, NEVER for colour or exposure.

    The BKG is just too busy and conflicts with the rack and so both blur into one, you want separation and clarity and so the screen would have helped here to highlight the issue. Try to pick better backdrops (where possible), move position, wait, track the subject, see where the subjects are moving and plan ahead and try to get more space between subject & BKG. If you are further away from the subject I think it would have been better. and the backdrop more diffused.

    TFS
    Steve

  7. Thanks John Mack thanked for this post
  8. #5
    Macro and Flora Moderator Jonathan Ashton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Cheshire UK
    Posts
    17,333
    Threads
    2,665
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I think the elk is well rendered - good detail in the nose and rack, but I am not keen on the crop, I think if portrait was the important thing it might have been better if the head was raised rather more.
    The background is less than ideal, you could blur it gently or add negative clarity and or reduce contrast but I doubt it would make a significant difference.

  9. Thanks John Mack thanked for this post
  10. #6
    Wildlife Moderator Steve Kaluski's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2009
    Location
    Somewhere in the world
    Posts
    20,690
    Threads
    1,296
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    The background is less than ideal, you could blur it gently or add negative clarity and or reduce contrast but I doubt it would make a significant difference.
    Or another adjustment Jon , but the issue would then be some very careful masking.

  11. #7
    BPN Member Andreas Liedmann's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Dortmund / Germany
    Posts
    11,261
    Threads
    1,275
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi John another cool frame of that stag ...with the lower POV and the head slightly lifted does work well !!!
    Agree the BG is busy .. nothing would have helped here really !!!!
    Do not under stand why moving backward would be better ....?
    Again .... isolate the BG in post and drop the contrast , does help a tiny bit .

    TFS Andreas

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics