Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: Out on a limb.

  1. #1
    Lifetime Member Marc Mol's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Somewhere else in the World
    Posts
    4,801
    Threads
    709
    Thank You Posts

    Default Out on a limb.

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Just back from a fabulous 16 days in Vumbura, with one highlight was documenting 2 sub adult leopards for 11 of those 16, being fortunate to see them almost daily.

    Oddly enough it was the mother that was somwhat skittish and saw here only on 2 occasions as she called her kids and led them away to her kills.

    Here the 18 mth old female steps out to better guage her prey, a small herd of Reedbuck she had eyes on.

    It was 6.35pm and the sun had set as she stepped out from the darkness and shade of a heavy canopy, I cropped out some specular highlights to 4;5 format and selectively reduce the BG exp by 1/2 stop and added a slight warm tone to this B&W conversion for this months theme,

    although I personally feel the colour version has more merit.

    NG 12 concession- Botswana.

    Nikon D5
    Nikkor 400 f/2.8E FL VR
    1/1600s
    f/3.5
    ISO25600

    1400px wide.

    Cheers
    Marc


  2. #2
    Lifetime Member Rachel Hollander's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2010
    Location
    NYC
    Posts
    14,320
    Threads
    929
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Marc - Welcome back. I like the pose on the branch and the intensity of her stare at the prey. Sharpness looks good and I like the conversion but the high ISO has introduced a lot of noise and gritty look to the leopard. I understand though not using a spotlight so as not to give her position away while on the hunt so applaud your ethics once again.

    TFS,
    Rachel

  3. Thanks Marc Mol thanked for this post
  4. #3
    Lifetime Member Marc Mol's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Somewhere else in the World
    Posts
    4,801
    Threads
    709
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    Thanks Rachel

    Quote Originally Posted by Rachel Hollander View Post
    but the high ISO has introduced a lot of noise and gritty look to the leopard.
    Granted the sun had set and light was absolutley minimal, it's impossible not to have degrees of noise here and if it weren't for the class leading D5 this would not have been possible, the big difference is, yes there is (colour) noise but it's not at the expense of detail which is still holding up well I feel.

    Here's the colour version.


  5. #4
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Feb 2011
    Location
    Nagpur, India
    Posts
    3,837
    Threads
    245
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Marc -- definitely the BW version for me and i am ok with the noise in it , gives a vintage feel to the image. I really liked the pose and appreciate your work ethic as always. very nicely done.

    TFS !

  6. Thanks Marc Mol thanked for this post
  7. #5
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jul 2016
    Location
    Ithaca, NY
    Posts
    10,421
    Threads
    1,708
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I like both versions of this one. Nice pose and i like that stare. Looks great for that high ISO.

  8. Thanks Marc Mol thanked for this post
  9. #6
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Mar 2012
    Location
    Hyderabad, India
    Posts
    5,088
    Threads
    1,356
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Stunning detail at that ISO with the B&W working quiet well here. Nice one Marc. Look forward to more.

  10. Thanks Marc Mol thanked for this post
  11. #7
    BPN Member Andreas Liedmann's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Dortmund / Germany
    Posts
    11,254
    Threads
    1,271
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Marc ...i do like the image from the content POV , with the Leopard looking into the dead space !!
    Well framed and captured .
    The B&W does work well in terms of contrast and tone , the color version is a bit too contrasty in my eyes .
    Both versions ... does not work well in terms of noise , well just my honest opinion , would accept better IQ at that LOW HIGH Iso for a Nikon . But easy to say without seeing the RAW .
    Nevertheless it is worth trying a version with less contrast to avoid the high noise level .

    TFS Andreas

    Sanjeev .... wonder where you see detail , i just see tons of noise .

  12. #8
    BPN Member Morkel Erasmus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    14,858
    Threads
    1,235
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I like the shallow DOF here and the leopard emerging out of darkness.

    Have to agree it looks just a tad too noisy from what I would expect given the gear that was used - perhaps it was a tad underexposed to begin with? My initial thoughts on the techs were that you could easily have gone to 1/800 or even 1/500 with that lens and gained some ISO/exposure?
    Morkel Erasmus

    WEBSITE


  13. Thanks Marc Mol thanked for this post
  14. #9
    Lifetime Member Marc Mol's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Somewhere else in the World
    Posts
    4,801
    Threads
    709
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Morkel Erasmus View Post
    I like the shallow DOF here and the leopard emerging out of darkness.

    Have to agree it looks just a tad too noisy from what I would expect given the gear that was used - perhaps it was a tad underexposed to begin with? My initial thoughts on the techs were that you could easily have gone to 1/800 or even 1/500 with that lens and gained some ISO/exposure?
    I should clarify that for part of this trip I had loaned the D5/400 to a client to try and he (accidently) changed one of my custom settings bank which I use/set for AF fine tune/JPG only and not noticed for a while, and so this image and many others was shot inadvertantly in JPG only , hence making the best of a bad PP situation.

    But do agree Morkel 1/500 or 1/800 would have likely sufficed, but cranked it to 1/1600 in anticipation of faster movement.


  15. #10
    BPN Member Morkel Erasmus's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2009
    Location
    South Africa
    Posts
    14,858
    Threads
    1,235
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Ugh, hate it when that happens.
    I often set the cameras to jpg for using at home shooting family stuff. Then go on a trip, takes me 2 days to realised I never set it to RAW again...
    Morkel Erasmus

    WEBSITE


  16. Thanks Marc Mol thanked for this post
  17. #11
    Macro and Flora Moderator Jonathan Ashton's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Cheshire UK
    Posts
    17,331
    Threads
    2,663
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I don't wish to be a smart *** but for the very reasons you mention I never set my DSLRs to jpeg, we will only have to guess what the result would have been had it been taken in raw. Sorry I have to say the first think I noticed was noise in the B&W and the colour version, without so much noise I bet it would have been a really good image.

  18. Thanks Marc Mol thanked for this post
  19. #12
    Lifetime Member Marc Mol's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Somewhere else in the World
    Posts
    4,801
    Threads
    709
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Jonathan Ashton View Post
    I don't wish to be a smart *** but for the very reasons you mention I never set my DSLRs to jpeg, we will only have to guess what the result would have been had it been taken in raw. Sorry I have to say the first think I noticed was noise in the B&W and the colour version, without so much noise I bet it would have been a really good image.
    I hear you Jonathan, have even had this happen to me when sending in my bodies for service @ Nikon Switzerland to find them returned set to JPG, got caught once with this.
    Agree....it's best not to set any menus to any JPG only setting.


  20. #13
    Forum Participant
    Join Date
    Jul 2015
    Location
    Singapore
    Posts
    361
    Threads
    61
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Hi Marc, I like color version better. For ISO 25600, final result is impressive. For B&W, I think if you subtract some black from white in selective color adjustment, it will make whites brighter and improve the image IMHO.

  21. #14
    Lifetime Member Marc Mol's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Somewhere else in the World
    Posts
    4,801
    Threads
    709
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Thanks Jay

    Quote Originally Posted by Jay Shah View Post
    For B&W, I think if you subtract some black from white in selective color adjustment, it will make whites brighter and improve the image IMHO.
    That's one of the techniques I used (albeit on a less subtle basis, as over doing it gives less satisfying results) with this image already.


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics