-
-
-
The repost is the one i prefer. Nice love angle and i like the dark background. Some more to the right would be nice.
-
Post a Thank You. - 1 Thanks
-
Report is much better. You can try to add more canvas to the right of the image. I do feel the image quality could be a bit better as well.
TFS
-
Post a Thank You. - 1 Thanks
-
Publisher
As this is something of a crop, would you be so kind as to post a JPEG that represents the full frame original image?
thanks with love, artie
BIRDS AS ART Blog: great info and lessons, lots of images with our legendary BAA educational Captions; we will not sell you junk. 30+ years of long lens experience/e-mail with gear questions.
BIRDS AS ART Online Store: we will not sell you junk. 35 years of long lens experience. Please e-mail with gear questions.
Check out the new SONY e-Guide and videos that I did with Patrick Sparkman here. Ten percent discount for BPN members,
E-mail me at samandmayasgrandpa@att.net.
-
Post a Thank You. - 1 Thanks
-
BPN Member
The funky hairdo really makes this shot, nicely done! I do agree that Michael's rework is significantly brighter and sharper.
-
Post a Thank You. - 1 Thanks
-
-
-
Publisher
Thanks Micheal. The big problem here i with the original image design; you placed the bird too low in the frame; after that, your crop choices were severely restricted ...In all crops and versions the bird needs lots more room below, at least enough to include the virtual tail (if not the virtual legs ...)
with ove, artie
BIRDS AS ART Blog: great info and lessons, lots of images with our legendary BAA educational Captions; we will not sell you junk. 30+ years of long lens experience/e-mail with gear questions.
BIRDS AS ART Online Store: we will not sell you junk. 35 years of long lens experience. Please e-mail with gear questions.
Check out the new SONY e-Guide and videos that I did with Patrick Sparkman here. Ten percent discount for BPN members,
E-mail me at samandmayasgrandpa@att.net.
-

Originally Posted by
Arthur Morris
Thanks Micheal. The big problem here i with the original image design; you placed the bird too low in the frame; after that, your crop choices were severely restricted ...In all crops and versions the bird needs lots more room below, at least enough to include the virtual tail (if not the virtual legs ...)
with ove, artie
You have a good eye! I totally agree, I do not remember why I framed it this way. maybe there was an object in the way.
thanks for the tips!
-
Publisher

Originally Posted by
Michael Thompson
You have a good eye! I totally agree, I do not remember why I framed it this way. maybe there was an object in the way.
thanks for the tips!
Even if there is some crap at the bottom it is often easy to remove it. We need to learn to think differently with digital :)
with love, artie
BIRDS AS ART Blog: great info and lessons, lots of images with our legendary BAA educational Captions; we will not sell you junk. 30+ years of long lens experience/e-mail with gear questions.
BIRDS AS ART Online Store: we will not sell you junk. 35 years of long lens experience. Please e-mail with gear questions.
Check out the new SONY e-Guide and videos that I did with Patrick Sparkman here. Ten percent discount for BPN members,
E-mail me at samandmayasgrandpa@att.net.
-
Post a Thank You. - 1 Thanks