Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Broad Billed Hummingbird (male) II

  1. #1
    Wally Nussbaumer
    Guest

    Default Broad Billed Hummingbird (male) II

    Attached Images Attached Images
     
    It attempted to add a small flower as suggested in previous comments, not too sure about the results.
    Canon Rebel XTi, Canon EF 70-200 f/2.8 L series f/25 at 1/250 SS ISO 100, X-sync flash (4)

  2. #2
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jun 2008
    Location
    Palmdale, California
    Posts
    429
    Threads
    31
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    I really like this image, and the placement of the flower too.
    It's amazing how fast these little things can fly. Even hovering they tend to hover, scoot, hover, scoot.
    You did well in capturing this.

    Sharna

  3. #3
    Wally Nussbaumer
    Guest

    Default

    Thank you for looking Sharna, glad you like it!

  4. #4
    BPN Viewer
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    Lakeville, MN
    Posts
    1,381
    Threads
    150
    Thank You Posts

    Default

    Perfect placement of the flower! I really like this one Wally.

  5. #5
    Wally Nussbaumer
    Guest

    Default

    Thanks Mike.

  6. #6
    Michael Castellano
    Guest

    Default

    Hi Walter. As you know I'm not a fan of adding flowers to hummer photos. But in any case, I think I would have placed the flower closer to the hummer. The image of the hummer itself is a strong one, however, and stand on its own nicely. BTW, I just had an image removed for being a composite -- it was actually two separate photos of a robin attacking a worm placed side by side. Wouldn't this image also be considered a composite?

  7. #7
    Wally Nussbaumer
    Guest

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Michael Castellano View Post
    Hi Walter. As you know I'm not a fan of adding flowers to hummer photos. But in any case, I think I would have placed the flower closer to the hummer. The image of the hummer itself is a strong one, however, and stand on its own nicely. BTW, I just had an image removed for being a composite -- it was actually two separate photos of a robin attacking a worm placed side by side. Wouldn't this image also be considered a composite?
    good question Michael. Removed from here?

  8. #8
    Wally Nussbaumer
    Guest

    Default

    ask the moderator. Assuming it was here. Reading the TOS "posting something that is knowingly false" isn't permitted so I would say the addition of anything falls under that heading.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
Web Analytics